Refugee and Migrant Women's Views of Antenatal Ultrasound on the Thai Burmese Border: A Mixed Methods Study

Abstract

BackgroundAntenatal ultrasound suits developing countries by virtue of its versatility, relatively low cost and safety, but little is known about women’s or local provider’s perspectives of this upcoming technology in such settings. This study was undertaken to better understand how routine obstetric ultrasound is experienced in a displaced Burmese population and identify barriers to its acceptance by local patients and providers.Methodology/Principal FindingsQualitative (30 observations, 19 interviews, seven focus group discussions) and quantitative methods (questionnaire survey with 644 pregnant women) were used to provide a comprehensive understanding along four major themes: safety, emotions, information and communication, and unintended consequences of antenatal ultrasound in refugee and migrant clinics on the Thai Burmese border. One of the main concerns expressed by women was the danger of childbirth which they mainly attributed to fetal malposition. Both providers and patients recognized ultrasound as a technology improving the safety of pregnancy and delivery. A minority of patients experienced transitory shyness or anxiety before the ultrasound, but reported that these feelings could be ameliorated with improved patient information and staff communication. Unintended consequences of overuse and gender selective abortions in this population were not common.Conclusions/SignificanceThe results of this study are being used to improve local practice and allow development of explanatory materials for this population with low literacy. We strongly encourage facilities introducing new technology in resource poor settings to assess acceptability through similar inquiry.

Pregnant migrant and refugee women’s perceptions of mental illness on the Thai-Myanmar border: a qualitative study

“…The presence of two researchers for up to ten participants shifts the balance in favour of participants and empowers them [ 43 ]. FGDs have been used in the Thai-Myanmar border population for many years [ 44 ] and are a culturally-accepted method particularly suited to low-literacy populations [ 31 , 32 ]. The running of these FGDs in themselves will have created a certain level of awareness amongst participants and others of mental illness in the population.…”

“…The population served by SMRU consists of migrants and refugees from Myanmar living along the Thai-Myanmar border. The local population is mostly of Karen ethnic background, has Christian, Buddhist, Muslim and animist religious beliefs and speaks up to five different languages and dialects including Sgaw Karen, Po Karen, Burmese, Thai and English [ 31 , 32 ]. Maela is the largest established refugee camp along the border with a population of 43,000 [ 33 ].…”

A Low-Cost Ultrasound Program Leads to Increased Antenatal Clinic Visits and Attended Deliveries at a Health Care Clinic in Rural Uganda

“…Rijken et al found that women on the Thai-Burmese border were likely to view ultrasound favorably as a technology that could increase safety during pregnancy and delivery [19]. However there has also been concern for overuse of ultrasound scanning during pregnancy with multiple follow up scans recommended, potentially as a way for private clinics to increase revenue [20], [21].…”

A case of ultrasound-guided prenatal diagnosis of prune belly syndrome in Papua New Guinea – implications for management

“…In addition to mapping the burden of birth defects in PNG, future research needs to evaluate the acceptability of ultrasound as part of antenatal care amongst women in PNG. Such findings can assist with developing culturally-appropriate guidelines, as observed elsewhere [35]. Similarly, understanding beliefs and attitudes towards birth defects, and the impact of the latter on the acceptability of ultrasound, clinical research, induced abortion and palliative treatment of affected fetuses is urgently required.…”