Refugee camp health services utilisation by non-camp residents as an indicator of unaddressed health needs of surrounding populations: a perspective from Mae La refugee camp in Thailand during 2006 and 2007

Abstract

Introduction This study explored the differences on the level of medical care required by camp and non-camp resident patients during utilisation of the health services in Mae La refugee camp, Tak province, Thailand during the years 2006 and 2007. Methods Data were extracted from camp registers and the Health Information System used during the years 2006 and 2007 and statistical analysis was performed. Results The analysis showed that during 2006 and 2007 non-camp resident patients, coming from Thailand as well as Myanmar, who sought care in the outpatient department (OPD) of the camp required at a significantly higher proportion admission to the inpatient department (IPD) or referral to the district hospital compared to camp resident patients. Although there was a statistically significant increased mortality of the non-camp resident patients admitted in the IPD compared to camp resident patients, there was no significant difference in mortality among these two groups when the referrals to the district hospital were analysed. Conclusion Non-camp resident patients tended to need a more advanced level of medical care compared to camp resident patients. Provided that this it is further validated, the above observed pattern might be potentially useful as an indirect indicator of unaddressed health needs of populations surrounding a refugee camp.

Burden of eye disease and demand for care in the Bangladesh Rohingya displaced population and host community: A cohort study

“…An important part of the service model developed by Orbis and partners in this setting was the delivery of care to the host population as well as the unsettled Rohingya. Consistent with other reports [36], we found a high demand for eye care, particularly eyeglasses, in the host population. Improving vision among children and adults in host communities can help build their capacity to support displaced populations in their midst.…”

Situation of Self-Reported Anxiety and Depression among Urban Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Thailand, 2019

“…Refugees in sheltered areas along the Thai border have been recognized by the Thai government for years (since the exodus of people from Myanmar into Thailand in 1988; n~100,000). The health of these sheltered refugees is de facto covered by numerous charitable agencies in the shelters, such as the American Refugee Committee International, as well as nearby district hospitals if the patients’ disease conditions are beyond the care capacity of these agencies [ 28 ]. In contrast, RAS in urban settings (so-called urban refugees and asylum seekers (URAS)) appear to be overlooked by the policy [ 29 ].…”

Access to Non-Communicable Disease (NCD) Services Among Urban Refugees and Asylum Seekers, Relative to the Thai Population, 2019: A Case Study in Bangkok, Thailand

“…This is because the situation of refugees in temporary shelters is well known by local healthcare providers and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and international non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have provided humanitarian assistance for years. 10,11 In contrast, about 5000 urban refugees and asylum seekers (URAS) are not covered by any public health insurance and there is no clear public agency mandated to take care of their well-being. In addition, most URAS face many difficulties in accessing health services, including barriers caused by poverty, language, and culture.…”