Refugee Registration as Foreclosure of the Freedom to Move: The Virtualisation of Refugees' Rights within Maps of International Protection

Abstract

The lack of solid footing in political space is what makes the human rights claims of refugees most vulnerable in the contemporary international order. However, modern international human rights law and protection are predicated on a spatialised sense of the subject of rights that is formed in opposition to and in exclusion of the refugee. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) seeks to locate refugees as part of the universe of human rights through refugee registration exercises; it attempts to map their displacement within the geography of emplaced citizenry. Its conventional efforts in this regard fail, though, and, rather, serve to illustrate how the informal international movement of refugees still exceeds and, thus, undermines the universalism of the UN vision of human rights and freedoms. Consequently, the UNHCR has recently resorted to the highly sophisticated computerised registration technology, called proGres, under its Project Profile system. While the detail and complexity of Project Profile allow for a mapping no more capable of accurately tracing the movements of refugees within the global geography of universal human rights, the complex of digitalised mapping systems brought together within Project Profile permit the production and performance of an international space in which humanitarians may expect refugees to fit. The force of the UNHCR's new registration system is to produce a manner of spatialising refugees that can legitimate and moralise their constraint within orders of international politics and security which allow little room for response to the rights claims of refugees. Rather, their claims to human rights become foreclosed within a virtual understanding of human displacement with respect to emplacement in the state.

Mediating culture in transnational spaces: An example of young people from refugee backgrounds

“…There is an emerging body of research that provides useful accounts of the risks associated with this revolution, including increased capacity for surveillance and new modes of social exclusion and inequality (e.g. Collins 2009;Franke 2009;Percival and Hanson 2006;Wilding 2006Wilding , 2009. At the same time, there is growing attention to the new opportunities that arise out of these shifts.…”

Patrols, records and pictures: Demonstrations of Europe in the midst of migration’s crisis

“…Here, 'migration crisis' is, first, something to be recorded, a host of flows to be measured at a myriad of locations along the way through haphazardly developed methods that are continuously reconsidered due to problems of objectification (Carrera and Hernanz 2015;Franke, 2009). The introduction of 'hot spots' is one, major example of authorities, particularly Frontex, seeking to push through new methods of recording in place of ones that did not produce sufficiently translocal objectivity.…”

Human Rights Beyond Humanitarianism: The Radical Challenge to the Right to Asylum in the Mediterranean Zone

“…Moreover, feminist criticisms have emphasized how human rights are frequently utilized to strengthen structures of patriarchy (MacKinnon ; Okin ; Robinson 1998). Finally, the post‐Enlightenment principle of the universality of rights based on the equality of mankind, when viewed in the context of current migration policies, definitively reveals the central paradox of human rights, claimed both as universal and unconditional but at the same time fundamentally “conceived in terms of the freedom of citizenship within national spaces” (Franke :352). This paradox is synthetized by Isin (:55) when he writes that “without the force of (state) law human rights remain unenforceable and yet the most vulnerable are those without the protection of the state”.…”