2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11273-008-9109-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refugees or ravenous predators: detecting predation on new recruits to tropical estuarine nurseries

Abstract: Many of the most abundant small and juvenile fishes within shallow water estuarine nursery habitats consume other fish to some degree but have rarely been considered as potentially important predators in the functioning of these systems because of the low (\50%) average occurrence of fish in their diets. Predation by abundant minor piscivores on new recruits when they first enter the nursery may make a significant contribution to the predation mortality of this critical life-history stage. To determine the pot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Predation is usually the largest source of mortality for juvenile fish (Harter and Heck 2006), so high risk areas, such as transition zones between refuge and feeding areas (Hammerschlag et al 2010) may represent ecological bottlenecks. For example, predatory activity at these locations can control the supply of recruits to nursery grounds (MacGregor and Houde 1994, Brown et al 2004) and the supply of juveniles from nursery grounds to adult populations (Yurk andTrites 2000, Friedland et al 2012), and so provide the opportunity for predatory control of nursery populations (Baker and Sheaves 2009b). In addition, these refuge-food acquisition trade-offs vary between species (Camp et al 2011) meaning that nursery ground values may differ markedly depending on the species involved.…”
Section: Food/predation Trade-offs (Fig 1f)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predation is usually the largest source of mortality for juvenile fish (Harter and Heck 2006), so high risk areas, such as transition zones between refuge and feeding areas (Hammerschlag et al 2010) may represent ecological bottlenecks. For example, predatory activity at these locations can control the supply of recruits to nursery grounds (MacGregor and Houde 1994, Brown et al 2004) and the supply of juveniles from nursery grounds to adult populations (Yurk andTrites 2000, Friedland et al 2012), and so provide the opportunity for predatory control of nursery populations (Baker and Sheaves 2009b). In addition, these refuge-food acquisition trade-offs vary between species (Camp et al 2011) meaning that nursery ground values may differ markedly depending on the species involved.…”
Section: Food/predation Trade-offs (Fig 1f)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, these periods of high abundance would provide large numbers of prey fish that could support an abundance of predators (e.g. Juanes and Conover 1995;Baker and Sheaves, 2009a), but predator abundances would be limited by low numbers of prey fish when few offshore spawners were present. This could be offset by predators switching to feed on estuary residents, alternate prey, or moving to other habitats, but any of these responses again adds considerable complexity to overall community dynamics (Baker and Sheaves 2009b).…”
Section: Drivers Of Temporal Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the lack of post‐settlement snapper, set netting did confirm the presence of some piscivorous fish species, specifically kahawai and hammerhead shark. Further investigation of the diet of these two species may be warranted, although obtaining appropriate sample sizes may prove challenging considering that catch rates are likely to be low and that the consumption of small fishes by these predators can be extremely sporadic (Baker & Sheaves, 2009b ). As such, a much more extensive and temporally replicated set netting effort would likely be required to identify important predators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%