2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaa.2006.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refuse patterning and behavioral analysis in a pinniped hunting camp in the Late Jomon Period: A case study in layer V at the Hamanaka 2 site, Rebun Island, Hokkaido, Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A short summary of Rebun archaeology provided by Sakaguchi (2007aSakaguchi ( , 2007b points out that the oldest remains of human activities on Rebun Island are Palaeolithic microblades, microcores and tanged projectile points dating to c. 22,000-13,000 cal. yr BP.…”
Section: Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A short summary of Rebun archaeology provided by Sakaguchi (2007aSakaguchi ( , 2007b points out that the oldest remains of human activities on Rebun Island are Palaeolithic microblades, microcores and tanged projectile points dating to c. 22,000-13,000 cal. yr BP.…”
Section: Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both are located in the northern part of the island close to Lake Kushu ( Figure 1d). Sakaguchi (2007a) has suggested that the Hamanaka 2 site was first used by the late Jomon maritime hunter-gatherers as a campsite for intensive hunting and processing, while it was used as a human burial area and dog butchering site during the Okhotsk period. The first BHAP excavations in summer 2011 confirmed the high research potential of the Hamanaka 2 site.…”
Section: The Hamanaka 2 Archaeological Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the composition of occupation surfaces is determined by variable and complex sets of interactions between a wide range of processes (Carr, 1984;Gé et al, 1993;LaMotta and Schiffer, 1999;Wandsnider, 1996). Most floor formation processes are cultural: intentional or accidental human actions that result in the deposition and/or removal of particular artefacts and residues -especially larger objects, which tend to be removed, dumped, redistributed or cached when activity areas or buildings are being cleaned or abandoned (Lange and Rydberg, 1972;Sakaguchi, 2007;Stevenson, 1982;Tani, 1995;Tomka, 1993). But there is also a range of natural processes that can alter the composition of occupation deposits with the passage of time, as they become subject to the same physical, chemical, and biological processes that affect local landforms and soils (Brink, 1977;Johnson and Hansen, 1974;Rolfsen, 1980;Schiffer, 1996;Stein, 1983;Wood and Johnson, 1978).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While previous 813 work has cautioned about the extraordinary 814 costs associated with fine-grained analyses 815 of microrefuse (Metcalfe and Heath, 1990), 816 here we show that these interpretations are 817 possible even with relatively coarse-grained 818 excavation techniques relying on a 1-x-1m grid and nested 6-mm and 3-mm mesh 820 screens. One final condition to consider con- Asia (e.g., Sakaguchi, 2007), and the Ameri- While the findings presented here are en-864 couraging, future ethnoarchaeological inves-865 tigations are needed to confirm these results 866 and examine how they vary in different con-867 texts. Existing data from extensive stud-868 ies in Africa (e.g., Yellen, 1977; O'Connell 869 et al, 1991) and Australia (e.g., Hayden, 870 1979;O'Connell, 1987) could also be used 871 to evaluate some or all of these hypotheses.…”
Section: Applications In Archaeological Contexts 794mentioning
confidence: 78%