2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.06.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regarding “Prediction of 30-day mortality after endovascular repair or open surgery in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A retrospective, multicentred, nonconsecutive sample of 500 patients undergoing aneurysm repair at general surgical units in Glasgow between 1980 and 1990 was examined for risk factors associated with death. 5,6 The poor performance of the GAS in contemporary series of patients undergoing AAA repair is unsurprising given the origins of the dataset with which it was modeled -patients treated with open surgery in low-volume, nonspecialist, general surgical units more than 20 years ago. When applied to our own series' of both retrospective and prospective data on patients undergoing attempted repair of ruptured AAA, the instrument performed with moderate accuracy at best, and lacked discriminative ability in patients at high risk.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A retrospective, multicentred, nonconsecutive sample of 500 patients undergoing aneurysm repair at general surgical units in Glasgow between 1980 and 1990 was examined for risk factors associated with death. 5,6 The poor performance of the GAS in contemporary series of patients undergoing AAA repair is unsurprising given the origins of the dataset with which it was modeled -patients treated with open surgery in low-volume, nonspecialist, general surgical units more than 20 years ago. When applied to our own series' of both retrospective and prospective data on patients undergoing attempted repair of ruptured AAA, the instrument performed with moderate accuracy at best, and lacked discriminative ability in patients at high risk.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%