Stadtbaustein Bildung 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-07314-5_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regelungsbereiche des kommunalen Bildungsmanagements im Programm „Lernen vor Ort“

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the debate on education and educational science, efforts are being made to link the concept to pre-existing conceptual approaches such as all-day schooling (Bleckmann & Durdel, 2009;Coelen, 2009;Stolz, 2009), cooperation between the youth welfare services and schools (e.g., Maykus, 2009), and the concept of appropriation (Deinet, 2015), or to question the validity of organizational and regulatory structures in the context of local educational landscapes (e.g., Lindner, Niedlich, Klausing, & Brüsemeister, 2015aOlk & Stimpel, 2011;Tibussek, 2009). Furthermore, findings from accompanying projects are making their way into the discourse on practical implementation within municipalities (e.g., Kucharz, Bohl, Eisnach, Fink, & Müller, 2009;Olk, 2015), or to support programs (such as the "Learning Locally" program) aimed at establishing the concept (Lindner et al, 2015a(Lindner et al, , 2015b. Spatial theorists are also increasingly interested in the concept; they mainly discuss local educational landscapes from the point of view of education as a strategy for sustainable urban and district development, or as a component of urban or regional space (e.g., Reutlinger, 2011;Tibussek, 2015).…”
Section: The Current State Of the German Debate On Local Educational mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within the debate on education and educational science, efforts are being made to link the concept to pre-existing conceptual approaches such as all-day schooling (Bleckmann & Durdel, 2009;Coelen, 2009;Stolz, 2009), cooperation between the youth welfare services and schools (e.g., Maykus, 2009), and the concept of appropriation (Deinet, 2015), or to question the validity of organizational and regulatory structures in the context of local educational landscapes (e.g., Lindner, Niedlich, Klausing, & Brüsemeister, 2015aOlk & Stimpel, 2011;Tibussek, 2009). Furthermore, findings from accompanying projects are making their way into the discourse on practical implementation within municipalities (e.g., Kucharz, Bohl, Eisnach, Fink, & Müller, 2009;Olk, 2015), or to support programs (such as the "Learning Locally" program) aimed at establishing the concept (Lindner et al, 2015a(Lindner et al, , 2015b. Spatial theorists are also increasingly interested in the concept; they mainly discuss local educational landscapes from the point of view of education as a strategy for sustainable urban and district development, or as a component of urban or regional space (e.g., Reutlinger, 2011;Tibussek, 2015).…”
Section: The Current State Of the German Debate On Local Educational mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial accompanying studies and evaluations of federal and regional funding programs (e.g., DKJS, 2012aDKJS, , 2012bHuber, Kilic, Schwander, & Wolfgramm, 2014;Meinecke, Schalkhaußer, & Täubig, 2009;Projektleitung "Selbständige Schule," 2004;Stolz, 2008;Tippelt, Dobischat, Hagen, & Nuissl von Rhein, 2006) have provided some initial ideas and indications of what causes municipal educational landscapes to succeed or fail. Other national studies on local educational landscapes have mainly shed light on potentials, cooperative work, and cooperative networks in and around school networks or local educational landscapes, and the organizational structures within them (e.g., Berkemeyer & Bos, 2010;Berkemeyer, Kuper, Manitius, & Müthing, 2009;Huber, 2014aHuber, , 2014bHuber, Ahlgrimm, & Hader-Popp, 2012;Lindner et al, 2015aLindner et al, , 2015bNiemann, 2014;Olk, 2015). Not until recently has the empirical spotlight also been shone on the users of local educational landscapes (e.g., Wüstenrot Stiftung, 2015).…”
Section: The National State Of Research On Local Educational Landscapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the debate on education and educational science, efforts are being made to link the concept to pre-existing conceptual approaches such as all-day schooling (Bleckmann & Durdel, 2009;Coelen, 2009;Stolz, 2009), cooperation between the youth welfare services and schools (e.g., Maykus, 2009), and the concept of appropriation (Deinet, 2015), or to question the validity of organizational and regulatory structures in the context of local educational landscapes (e.g., Lindner, Niedlich, Klausing, & Brüsemeister, 2015aTibussek, 2009). Furthermore, findings from accompanying projects are making their way into the discourse on practical implementation within municipalities (e.g., Kucharz, Bohl, Eisnach, Fink, & Müller, 2009;Olk, 2015), or to support programs (such as the "Learning Locally" program) aimed at establishing the concept (Lindner et al, 2015a(Lindner et al, , 2015b. Spatial theorists are also increasingly interested in the concept; they mainly discuss local educational landscapes from the point of view of education as a strategy for sustainable urban and district development, or as a component of urban or regional space (e.g., Reutlinger, 2011;Tibussek, 2015).…”
Section: The Current State Of the German Debate On Local Educational mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial accompanying studies and evaluations of federal and regional funding programs (e.g., DKJS, 2012aDKJS, , 2012bHuber, Kilic, Schwander, & Wolfgramm, 2014;Meinecke, Schalkhaußer, & Täubig, 2009;Projektleitung "Selbständige Schule," 2004;Stolz, 2008;Tippelt, Dobischat, Hagen, & Nuissl von Rhein, 2006) have provided some initial ideas and indications of what causes municipal educational landscapes to succeed or fail. Other national studies on local educational landscapes have mainly shed light on potentials, cooperative work, and cooperative networks in and around school networks or local educational landscapes, and the organizational structures within them (e.g., Berkemeyer & Bos, 2010;Berkemeyer, Kuper, Manitius, & Müthing, 2009;Huber, 2014aHuber, , 2014bHuber, Ahlgrimm, & Hader-Popp, 2012;Lindner et al, 2015aLindner et al, , 2015bNiemann, 2014;Olk, 2015). Not until recently has the empirical spotlight also been shone on the users of local educational landscapes (e.g., Wüstenrot Stiftung, 2015).…”
Section: The National State Of Research On Local Educational Landscapesmentioning
confidence: 99%