2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.01.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regeneration failure in Atlantic oakwoods: the roles of ungulate grazing and invertebrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
53
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ever since, he has been followed by dozens of researchers confirming his pessimistic findings from various European regions (e.g. Shaw 1968aShaw , b, 1974Palmer et al 2004;Götmark et al 2005;Perrin et al 2006;Rackham 2006;Petritan et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ever since, he has been followed by dozens of researchers confirming his pessimistic findings from various European regions (e.g. Shaw 1968aShaw , b, 1974Palmer et al 2004;Götmark et al 2005;Perrin et al 2006;Rackham 2006;Petritan et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We suspect that such a discrete model of landscape somehow 'determines' the pursuit of oak regeneration confined to woodland patches, in particular where oaks are present in the canopy layer. Deciduous Quercus species are representative components of the canopy in many managed and protected forest types in Europe, and many silvicultural methods were developed to regenerate oak in high forest systems (von Lüpke 1998;Palmer et al 2004;Annighöfer et al 2015). However, natural regeneration and successful recruitment into the canopy layer of such forests are usually missing without human support (Vera 2000 and references therein; Bobiec et al 2011a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, while an understanding of forest spatial dynamics is important, buffer zones and provision of appropriate exclosures in areas of significant species loss (e.g. Mcinnes et al 1992;Cooke 2002), or desired expansion (Romagosa & Robison 2003;Palmer et al 2004;Truscott et al 2004) may prove as, or more, significant to the delivery of conservation objectives.…”
Section: - mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One commonly accepted factor blamed for the shortage of oak in the new generation of trees is the strong competition and suppression by the shade-tolerant abundant undergrowth, particularly beech, lime and hornbeam (Vera 2000;Paluch 2005). Another factor considered responsible for the oak regeneration failure is grazing/browsing pressure referred to as 'game damages' (Paczoski 1930;Falinski 1986;Miścicki 1996;Kweczlich and Miścicki 2004;Palmer et al 2004;Götmark et al 2005;Paluch 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%