1965
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1965.tb06941.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regeneration of Protochlorophyll in Etiolated Barley Seedlings Following Different Light Treatments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

1967
1967
1984
1984

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classical experiments on lag elimination in chlorophyll synthesis in higher plants (3,32,44,45,49), including the action spectrum determinations of Virgin (46), established the following: (a) the optimal length of dark period following preillumination is approximately 4 hr, which is about the length of the normal lag period in these organisms; (b) the saturation duration for preillumination is a few minutes at most; and (c) preillumination by blue light is ineffective in lag elimination. Effectiveness was concentrated in a single broad peak in the red-orange region of the spectrum, suggesting the participation of the red-far red system, although the reversal by far red light was ambiguous in the case of wheat (46).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The classical experiments on lag elimination in chlorophyll synthesis in higher plants (3,32,44,45,49), including the action spectrum determinations of Virgin (46), established the following: (a) the optimal length of dark period following preillumination is approximately 4 hr, which is about the length of the normal lag period in these organisms; (b) the saturation duration for preillumination is a few minutes at most; and (c) preillumination by blue light is ineffective in lag elimination. Effectiveness was concentrated in a single broad peak in the red-orange region of the spectrum, suggesting the participation of the red-far red system, although the reversal by far red light was ambiguous in the case of wheat (46).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to convert protochlorophyll(ide) to chlorophyll(ide) in the dark has apparently been lost more slowly but is completely absent in the angiosperms, which are dependent on light for chlorophyll and chloroplast development. In these organisms, however, the concomitant elaboration of the phytochrome system has apparently resulted in this system's becoming an additional and often overriding control point in the induction of chloroplast formation (3,28,29,32,45,46,49), with the light-induced protochlorophyll(ide) to chlorophyll(ide) conversion assuming a secondary position. In Euglena, of course, the phytochrome system appears not to have been evolved, and the induction of chlorophyll and chloroplast formation is largely dependent on the light-induced conversion of protochlorophyll(ide) to chlorophyll(ide).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shibata (4) anid Btltler (5) nioted a lag phase in the dark synthesis which wN-as dependent oni the age of the leaf. Madsen (6) and Atgngstinnssen and Mladsen (7) reported a lag phase in the resynthesis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the increase produced by red light can be shown to be prevented by immediate far-red light these fatty acid changes could form part of the phytochrome-mediated elimination of the lag phase in chlorophyll formation (e.g. Augustinussen and Madsen 1965).…”
Section: Rfmentioning
confidence: 99%