Abstract:The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-seeded polyethylene-oxide-terephthalate/polybutylene-terephthalate (PEOT/PBT) scaffold for cartilage tissue repair in an osteochondral defect using a rabbit model. Materials characterisation using scanning electron microscopy indicated that the scaffold had a 3D architecture characteristic of the rapid prototyping fabrication method, with a strut diameter of 296 ± 52μm and a pore size of 512 ± 22μm x 476 ± 25μm x 180 ± 30μm. Chemical and morphological properties were typical of the PEOT/PBT copolymer. Moreover, the scaffold did not evoke an adverse cell response
Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporationin vitro or an inflammatory response in vivo. In terms of histological evaluation, no statistical difference was observed between the cell-free and cell-seeded scaffolds. Seeding the PEOT/PBT scaffolds with MSCs appeared to produce better scores for surface continuity, tidemark, thickness of repair, integration with native cartilage and degenerative changes in de novo and native tissue compared to the contralateral knee implanted with cell-free scaffolds. In summary, MSCs in combination with a 3D PEOT/PBT scaffold created a reparative environment for cartilage repair. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 2
AbstractThe main objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-seeded polyethylene-oxide-terephthalate/polybutylene-terephthalate (PEOT/PBT) scaffold for cartilage tissue repair in an osteochondral defect using a rabbit model. Materials characterisation using scanning electron microscopy indicated that the scaffold had a 3Darchitecture characteristic of the additive manufacturing fabrication method, with a strut diameter of 296 ± 52 μm and a pore size of 512 ± 22 μm x 476 ± 25 μm x 180 ± 30 μm.Chemical and morphological properties were typical of the PEOT/PBT copolymer. Moreover, the scaffold did not evoke an adverse cell response in vitro or an inflammatory response in vivo. In terms of histological evaluation, no statistical difference was observed between the cell-free and cell-seeded scaffolds. Seeding the PEOT/PBT scaffolds with MSCs appeared to produce better scores for surface continuity, tidemark, thickness of repair, integration with native cartilage and degenerative changes in de novo and native tissue compared to the contralateral knee implanted with cell-free scaffolds. In summary, MSCs in combination with a 3D PEOT/PBT scaffold created a reparative environment for cartilage repair.