2016
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.12630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regeneration processes on coarse woody debris in mixed forests: do tree germinants and seedlings have species‐specific responses when grown on coarse woody debris?

Abstract: 1. Tree regeneration on coarse woody debris (CWD) is considered to be one the most ecologically valuable aspects of CWD in forest systems. However, most studies have focused solely on uncovering the differences in establishment and growth on CWD (regarded as a homogeneous substrate) in comparison to the forest floor. Our study concentrates on the underlying mechanisms of germinant and seedling colonization patterns and demographic responses relative to various properties of CWD. 2.We analyzed the effects of CW… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Saproxylic communities consist not only of saprotrophic decomposers such as fungi, bacteria, protozoans, and invertebrates, but also autotrophic algae (including lichens), bryophytes, and vascular plants (Harmon et al, 1986;Stokland et al, 2012). The importance of deadwood as a site of regeneration of forest trees has been reported in boreal and subalpine (Harmon & Franklin, 1989;Hofgaard, 1993;Orman et al, 2016), temperate (Fukasawa, Komagata, & Kawakami, 2017;Harmon et al, 1986;Ota et al, 2012), and tropical forests (Sanchez et al, 2009;Santiago, 2000;Van der Meer et al, 1998). Focusing on ecological community networks associated with tree regeneration on deadwood is important for understanding forest dynamics which is another critical aspect of predicting the global carbon cycle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saproxylic communities consist not only of saprotrophic decomposers such as fungi, bacteria, protozoans, and invertebrates, but also autotrophic algae (including lichens), bryophytes, and vascular plants (Harmon et al, 1986;Stokland et al, 2012). The importance of deadwood as a site of regeneration of forest trees has been reported in boreal and subalpine (Harmon & Franklin, 1989;Hofgaard, 1993;Orman et al, 2016), temperate (Fukasawa, Komagata, & Kawakami, 2017;Harmon et al, 1986;Ota et al, 2012), and tropical forests (Sanchez et al, 2009;Santiago, 2000;Van der Meer et al, 1998). Focusing on ecological community networks associated with tree regeneration on deadwood is important for understanding forest dynamics which is another critical aspect of predicting the global carbon cycle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Marx and Walters , , Orman et al. ). For instance, evidence suggests that CWD from conifer species is a more favorable substrate for smaller‐seeded species seedling establishment and survival than CWD from angiosperm species (Cornett et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limited evidence also suggests that CWD is not a generic substrate. Rather, the ability of CWD to support developing tree seedlings may differ among phyletic groups (e.g., conifers vs. angiosperms) or individual tree species (Cornett et al 2001, Marx and Walters 2006, 2008, Orman et al 2016. For instance, evidence suggests that CWD from conifer species is a more favorable substrate for smaller-seeded species seedling establishment and survival than CWD from angiosperm species (Cornett et al 2001, Bolton andD'Amato 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beside emergence time, seed size and maternal or genetic effects may cause differences in seedling height (Kitajima & Fenner, ). Seedlings of the flush type phenology (i.e., shoot elongation and annual leaf production are completed at the time of emergence, such as in silver fir or Norway spruce) are usually much shorter than seedlings of the succeeding type phenology (Orman, Adamus, & Szewczyk, ). Seed size is decisive for the growth of seedlings of the flush type phenology, whereas emergence time is important for the growth of the succeeding type phenology (Seiwa, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%