2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.02.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regenerative matching axial vascularisation of absorbable 3D-printed scaffold for large bone defects: A first in human series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More than 60 published clinical cases as well as more than 100,000 mPCL scaffolds being implanted globally confirm both efficacy and safety of the construct (fig. S8) ( 40 48 ). Within both the preclinical studies and the clinical case, SGBR was found radiologically and confirmed biomechanically and histologically (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 60 published clinical cases as well as more than 100,000 mPCL scaffolds being implanted globally confirm both efficacy and safety of the construct (fig. S8) ( 40 48 ). Within both the preclinical studies and the clinical case, SGBR was found radiologically and confirmed biomechanically and histologically (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current trial builds on successful preclinical work performed by our group evaluating this technique in a well-characterised and validated large animal model 17 20 28 and it is supported by a successful clinical experience in a recently published case series. 21 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This prospective trial data will aim to confirm already existing case series data we have reported to date, which suggests that this approach is safe and well tolerated. 21 In terms of safety and tolerability, the methods used in this prospective trial are a variation to conventional standard of care which for these patients may be amputation. Specific reporting on safety and tolerability will include adverse events that occur during the study period as related to both the scaffold and surgical approach.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This trial will offer critical baseline data against which current and future implants can be compared. Tissue regeneration could be enhanced via scaffold refinements, including additives such as growth factors, osteoprogenitor cells, and vascular networks [35][36][37][38][39]. However, RMAV may always be necessary to optimize tissue regeneration.…”
Section: Study Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regenerative matching approach resulted in the enhanced volume of regenerate bone, as shown on plain x-ray and micro-CT images [20], and equivalent biomechanical torsional stiffness when compared to the approach using bone grafts alone. In December 2019, we performed a first-in-human case study of applied RMAV, wherein a 3D-printed mPCL-TCP scaffold with rhBMP-7 and vascularized corticoperiosteal flaps was used to successfully perform a reconstruction of a large calvarial defect that had failed to heal after conventional cranioplasty [39]. This work builds on our experiences with bone defect reconstructive research, and it will involve the regenerative matching technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%