2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.08.29.505534
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regenotyping structural variants through an accurate force-calling method

Abstract: Long-read sequencing technologies have great potential for the comprehensive discovery of structural variation (SV). However, the accurate genotype assignment for SV is still a challenge since the unavoidable factors like specific sequencing errors or limited coverages. Herein, we propose cuteSV2, a fast and accurate long-read-based re-genotyping approach that is able to force-calling genotypes for the given records. cuteSV2 is an upgraded version of cuteSV and applies an improved strategy of the refinement an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To comprehensively evaluate the SVDF performance, we first conducted tests on samples simulated using SURVIVOR [ 26 ] and PBSIM2 [ 27 ] (the implementation of simulate see Methods section). The alignment files of the simulated samples were inputted into the three latest SV calling tools, SVIM, Sniffles2 [ 28 ], and cuteSV2 [ 29 ], for SV detection. The evaluation results from SUVIVOR demonstrate that amongst the five SV types in PacBio and Nanopore simulated data, SVDF achieved the highest F1 scores compared to the other three calling tools ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To comprehensively evaluate the SVDF performance, we first conducted tests on samples simulated using SURVIVOR [ 26 ] and PBSIM2 [ 27 ] (the implementation of simulate see Methods section). The alignment files of the simulated samples were inputted into the three latest SV calling tools, SVIM, Sniffles2 [ 28 ], and cuteSV2 [ 29 ], for SV detection. The evaluation results from SUVIVOR demonstrate that amongst the five SV types in PacBio and Nanopore simulated data, SVDF achieved the highest F1 scores compared to the other three calling tools ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Sniffles [ 28 , 29 ] identifies potential SV-supporting alignments based on statistics and clusters them based on various factors. CuteSV [ 30 , 31 ] collects signatures from the aligned sequencing data and clusters them based on a defined distance metric. SVIM [ 32 ] collects signatures within and among alignments and performs graph clustering to identify maximum cliques as clusters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%