1972
DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(72)90169-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regge analysis and dual absorptive model for γN → πoN, γN → ηN and related processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Information about the relative contributions of the isovector ρ (and b 1 ) exchange and the isoscalar ω exchange amplitudes can be obtained by comparing the differential cross sections for π 0meson photoproduction on neutrons and on protons [25,75,76,77]. For the proton target the total reaction amplitude is given by the sum of the isovector and isoscalar contributions, while for the neutron target it is given by their difference.…”
Section: Total Cross Sections and The Ratio Of π 0 Photoproduction On...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information about the relative contributions of the isovector ρ (and b 1 ) exchange and the isoscalar ω exchange amplitudes can be obtained by comparing the differential cross sections for π 0meson photoproduction on neutrons and on protons [25,75,76,77]. For the proton target the total reaction amplitude is given by the sum of the isovector and isoscalar contributions, while for the neutron target it is given by their difference.…”
Section: Total Cross Sections and The Ratio Of π 0 Photoproduction On...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known [30] that polarization data constitute a rather crucial test for models based on Regge phenomenology. Indeed, all model calculations [36,37] available at the time when the experiments were published failed to reproduce the data on the beam asymmetry. The most recent analysis [22] of the γp→pη reaction is based on a Regge model proposed in 1970 [23] and considers only differential cross sections at photon energies above 4 GeV, but no polarization data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%