2016
DOI: 10.1080/1600910x.2016.1145590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regicide and resistance: Foucault's reconceptualization of power

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5. This seems very much to be in line with Foucault's focus on the (constitutive) relation between power, struggle, critique and resistance (Foucault, 1982(Foucault, : 794, 1998; see also Flohr, 2016;Hansen, 2016).…”
Section: Orcid Idsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…5. This seems very much to be in line with Foucault's focus on the (constitutive) relation between power, struggle, critique and resistance (Foucault, 1982(Foucault, : 794, 1998; see also Flohr, 2016;Hansen, 2016).…”
Section: Orcid Idsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Studies on biopedagogies at school often respond to this question by showing its undesirable outcomes or side effects. In this article, however, I take a different approach, and show how resistances to the top–down medical model on nutrition emerge from various sides, and are indeed an integral part of the model: in other words, resistance is always intrinsic to the exercise of power (Flohr 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, at the same time, tactics oppose strategy, the former being “an art of the weak,” that is to say, a space of autonomy and agency that individuals subjected to the meal policy carve out within the imposed strategy. Therefore, if the top–down model gives shape to a strategy based on nutritional science, tactics are forms of strategic reversibility and “the adaptive response and the unpredictable outcome of the exercise of power” (Flohr 2016).…”
Section: Politics Of the School Mealmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Hayward and Schuilenburg ( 2014 ) resistance serves as a “solvent of doxa, to continuously question obviousness and common sense, in order to create a new image of thought, and thus to remind us that things do not have to stay the way they are” (34). For Flohr ( 2016 ) resistance “occupies a threshold between contemporary configurations of power and the possibility that things might be otherwise” (50). In developing this perspective Lilja ( 2021 ) has made a substantial contribution essentially arguing that through repetition and over time, resistance can (and has) “produce[d] new and emerging realities,” new ways of thinking, new ways of viewing old problems while promoting a different and better vision for the future.…”
Section: Resistance As Constructivementioning
confidence: 99%