Regime Complexity and Complex Foreign Policy: China in International Development Finance Governance

Abstract

This paper examines China’s involvement in the governance of international development finance (IDF), analyzes its approach to the IDF regime complex, and explains its strategic policy incoherence. It shows that in recent decades China has actively engaged with the elemental IDF regimes at multiple levels – global, regional, cross‐regional, subregional, and bilateral. It argues that the Chinese government has been strategically incoherent in its policy toward IDF governance, lending support to competing models and norms. China’s ‘forum linking’ strategy with regard to multilateral development banks has enhanced international cooperation while its unconventional bilateral development assistance programs have facilitated ‘forum shopping’ by the recipient countries, thus undermining the traditional IDF framework. There are multiple sources of China’s strategic policy incoherence. Besides the country’s multiple identities and complex interests, this paper highlights the impact of the fragmented nature of the regime complex and Chinese perception of this fragmentation.

China’s Evolving Approach to Foreign Aid

“…109 However, China's shares in the major MDBs that it did not play a key role in establishing are rather limited: 5.7 per cent in the World Bank, 6.4 per cent in the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and, surprisingly, only 1.2 per cent in the African Development Bank (AfDB). 110 A notable exception is China's significant contributions to the replenishment of the IDA's concessional funds: it ranked 20th in the 2010-12 replenishment but rose to sixth in 2019-21. 111 This has allowed China to push for more IDA funding for infrastructure construction, which has not traditionally has been a priority area of development finance.…”

Status-quo enhancing versus status-quo challenging change in global economic governance: the case of China in finance and trade

“…30 Because of its domestic needs, development experiences, and strategic concerns China has adopted a multifaceted and complex approach in both finance and trade to further its interests. 31 Whether Beijing opts to contribute constructively in multilateral efforts, chooses to not participate, or exercises its outside bilateral options depends on its assessment of which strategy will further its interests in the most effective fashion. 32…”