“…[28] Overall, the data reveal ar ich interplay of non-covalent interactions that underlie nearly all aspects of this reaction. [91,[114][115][116][117][118] First, even though the catalysti tself is highly fluxional, exhibiting two interconverting conformations at room temperature, the active, acylated form of the catalyst is conformationally rigid due to p···p + interactions. This rigidity,c om- bined with an etwork of other non-covalenti nteractions, underlies the high degree of stereoselectivity.O ur data also support an ucleophilic mode of catalysis,w hich is rendered more favorable than alternative, base-catalyzed mechanisms due to the impacts of non-covalenti nteractions.F inally,w es howed near quantitative reproduction of experimental selectivities for six substrates and developed as tereochemical model of this reactioni nw hich p···p + interactions, ah ydrogen-bonding network involving the counteranion, and ak ey CH···O interaction between the a-hydrogens of substituents independently control the stereoselectivity.T hese latteri nteractions can be used to explain the selectivity of other substrates, including those that have not yet been tested experimentally.W hile similar non-covalent interactions have been shown to play important roles in KRs, [32,33,81,119] the reaction in Scheme 1i su nique in that these interactions control essentially all aspects of the reaction:t he rigidity of the active catalyst, the preferred mechanism, and the stereoselectivity.T his rich interplay of competing non-covalent interactions underscoret he resemblanceo fs ome organocatalytic systemst oe nzymes, in which selectivity,r eactivity,a nd mechanism are all modulated through the subtle effects of myriad stabilizing non-covalent interactions.…”