2023
DOI: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Region Expansion of Background Field Removal with Local Spherical Harmonics Approximation for Whole-brain Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping

Abstract: Purpose: Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is useful for obtaining biological information. To calculate susceptibility distribution, it is necessary to calculate the local field caused by the differences of susceptibility between the tissues. The local field can be obtained by removing a background field from a total field acquired by MR phase image. Conventional approaches based on spherical mean value (SMV) filtering, which are widely used for background field calculations, fail to calculate the back… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pulse sequence for QSM was a gradient-echo SWI sequence using the following param- susceptibility map in k-space before and after filtering. This process was described in previous reports (Shirai et al, 2022(Shirai et al, , 2015. The pulse sequence for the T1-weighted image (T1WI) was a three-dimensional fast field-echo technique using the following parameters: TR, 8.2 ms; TE, 4.6 ms; flip angles, 10; FOV, 260 mm; matrix size, 288 × 288; slice thickness, 0.9 mm; 200 slices; and acquisition time, 4 min and 42 s.…”
Section: Mri Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pulse sequence for QSM was a gradient-echo SWI sequence using the following param- susceptibility map in k-space before and after filtering. This process was described in previous reports (Shirai et al, 2022(Shirai et al, , 2015. The pulse sequence for the T1-weighted image (T1WI) was a three-dimensional fast field-echo technique using the following parameters: TR, 8.2 ms; TE, 4.6 ms; flip angles, 10; FOV, 260 mm; matrix size, 288 × 288; slice thickness, 0.9 mm; 200 slices; and acquisition time, 4 min and 42 s.…”
Section: Mri Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This software method consists of three steps: (I) iterative least square minimization, (II) adaptive edge‐preserving filtering to the susceptibility map in the minimization process, and (III) weighted addition of the susceptibility map in k‐space before and after filtering. This process was described in previous reports (Shirai et al., 2022, 2015). The pulse sequence for the T1‐weighted image (T1WI) was a three‐dimensional fast field‐echo technique using the following parameters: TR, 8.2 ms; TE, 4.6 ms; flip angles, 10; FOV, 260 mm; matrix size, 288 × 288; slice thickness, 0.9 mm; 200 slices; and acquisition time, 4 min and 42 s.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The brain surface was removed when calculating magnetic susceptibility, so it could not be visualized. Methods have been proposed for calculating magnetic susceptibility with brain surface corrections, 16 , 17 and it is thought that these methods will also make it possible to visualize veins on the surface of the brain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is a method for acquiring quantitative parameters other than relaxation time. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Since QSM can perform iron deposition and oxygen extraction fraction measurements, 12,13 it is expected to be useful for diagnosing cerebral iron deposition in tissues and cerebrovascular diseases. We previously proposed quantitative parameter mapping (QPM) as a method for acquiring T1, T2*, PD, and magnetic susceptibility simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T 1 and T 2 * values for WM and GM estimated using QPM were evaluated through comparison with reference values. 13 , 14 To evaluate the QSM obtained using QPM, we examined the correlation with QSM acquired at the same spatial resolution as QPM and the same imaging conditions as in the reference: FA = 15 degrees, TR = 35 ms, and TE = (7.0, 11.6, 16.2, 20.8, 25.4, and 30.0) ms. 15 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%