DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-75454-1_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Region Stability Proofs for Hybrid Systems

Abstract: We present a method and tool (and implementation) for automatic proofs of region stability for hybrid systems. The formal basis of our approach is the new notion of \emph{snapshot sequences}. We use snapshot sequences for a characterization of region stability. Our abstraction-based algorithm checks the conditions in this characterization. A number of experiments demonstrate the practical potential of our approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sound and complete proof rules for establishing region stability have been explored and automated [47], as have more efficient encodings of the proof rule that scale better in dimensionality [31]. However, all algorithms we are aware of for checking region stability require linear or simpler (timed or rectangular) ODEs [45,47,46,31,11,48]. Strong attractors are basins of attraction where every state in the state space eventually reaches a region of the state space [45].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sound and complete proof rules for establishing region stability have been explored and automated [47], as have more efficient encodings of the proof rule that scale better in dimensionality [31]. However, all algorithms we are aware of for checking region stability require linear or simpler (timed or rectangular) ODEs [45,47,46,31,11,48]. Strong attractors are basins of attraction where every state in the state space eventually reaches a region of the state space [45].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to probabilistic state reachability being investigated in the previous section, we now address the problem of probabilistic region stability. For that purpose, we take into account the notion of region stability as introduced for non-probabilistic hybrid systems by Podelski and Wagner in [PW07a,PW07b]. According to their definition, given some set R of states called region, a (non-probabilistic) system is called stable with respect to region R iff for every infinite run s 0 , s 1 , .…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter problem is motivated by the notion of region stability for nonprobabilistic hybrid systems [PW07a,PW07b], where a system is called stable with respect to some region R iff all system runs eventually reach R and finally stay in R forever. In this article, we suggest an adaptation of region stability to the probabilistic case along with a symbolic, interpolation-based procedure for the verification of probabilistic stability properties like "the probability that the system stabilizes within region R is at least 99.9%".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that this proof is related to the idea of region stability [15] and can be thought of as a stabilization proof for an unknown (and maybe hard to characterize) sub-region A inv ⊆ A into which all trajectories from A stabilize, and which is an invariant region for the system. Table 2 summarizes runtimes for this proof using iSAT and the different enclosure methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%