2011
DOI: 10.1097/aco.0b013e32834cd2f0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional anesthetic procedures in immunosuppressed patients

Abstract: So far, there are no guidelines available dealing with indications and limitations of regional anesthetic procedures in these patients. The complication rate is rare but potentially disastrous. However, the technique itself cannot be regarded as absolute contraindication for immunosuppressed patients if precautions are taken. An interdisciplinary approach regarding the indication of regional anesthesia techniques in immunosuppressed patients is recommended. Efforts must therefore be made to achieve an interdis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Most cases received a combination of immunosuppressants and corticosteroids during pregnancy. Although the incidence of epidural abscess caused by regional anesthesia in parturients after renal transplant remains unknown, patients receiving immunosuppressants are vulnerable to infections [12], suggesting that epidural abscess would be more commonly caused by neuraxial anesthesia in those women and strict aseptic techniques are recommended. We removed epidural catheters within 48 h in all patients in order to prevent infections following the suggestion by Gronwald [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most cases received a combination of immunosuppressants and corticosteroids during pregnancy. Although the incidence of epidural abscess caused by regional anesthesia in parturients after renal transplant remains unknown, patients receiving immunosuppressants are vulnerable to infections [12], suggesting that epidural abscess would be more commonly caused by neuraxial anesthesia in those women and strict aseptic techniques are recommended. We removed epidural catheters within 48 h in all patients in order to prevent infections following the suggestion by Gronwald [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In immunocompromised patients, regional anesthesia (peripherial nerve block and neuroaxial block) can be useful and should be considered in order to enable appropriate management of pain and reduce the risk for this patients. 8 The operation of our patient was performed under regional anesthesia, as preferred by the organ transplant centers because it provides better perfusion of organs. 8 Although the combined spinal-epidural anesthesia is more adequate choice, we were afraid of infection and other complications, although most of the available literature does not specify a higher incidence of these complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Es gibt ein theoretisches Risiko für eine erhöhte Inzidenz an Infektionen durch die Anlage peripherer Regionalanästhesien (Katheterverfahren > Single Shot) oder neuroaxialer Verfahren: Dies konnte allerdings nie belegt werden [16]…”
Section: Regionalanästhesie Merkeunclassified