2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional brain atrophy and cognitive decline depend on definition of subjective cognitive decline

Abstract: Background People with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) may be at increased risk for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, not all studies have observed this increased risk. This project examined whether four common methods of defining SCD yields different patterns of atrophy and future cognitive decline between cognitively normal older adults with (SCD+ ) and without SCD (SCD−). Methods Data from 273 Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative cognitively normal older a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
4

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
25
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our current study chose to use the CCI to define SMC since this is the measure that ADNI uses to define SMC and has been shown to be associated with reduced gray matter [ 30 ], worse Aβ and cerebrospinal fluid tau markers (particularly in APOE e4 carriers) [ 34 ], and faster cognitive decline relative to control participants [ 15 ]. There has been a significant effort, including the formation of the Subjective Cognitive Decline Initiative (SCD-I) working group, to define subjective cognitive decline, understand how measures of subjective cognitive decline/SMC overlap, and identify which measures are most useful [ 8 , 17 , 47 , 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our current study chose to use the CCI to define SMC since this is the measure that ADNI uses to define SMC and has been shown to be associated with reduced gray matter [ 30 ], worse Aβ and cerebrospinal fluid tau markers (particularly in APOE e4 carriers) [ 34 ], and faster cognitive decline relative to control participants [ 15 ]. There has been a significant effort, including the formation of the Subjective Cognitive Decline Initiative (SCD-I) working group, to define subjective cognitive decline, understand how measures of subjective cognitive decline/SMC overlap, and identify which measures are most useful [ 8 , 17 , 47 , 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding adds to a mixed literature on the relationship between perceived (or “subjective”) cognitive decline and structural neuroimaging findings such as atrophy and ventricular asymmetry ( 90 , 91 ). Importantly, aspects of the individual participant samples ( 92 ), as well as the measurement and definition of perceived cognitive decline ( 93 ), likely contribute to this variation in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous study found that using ECog to define SCD+ was associated with atrophy in the superior temporal region. On the other hand, using CCI to define SCD+ was associated with hippocampal change (Morrison et al, 2022), an area known to be associated with early AD pathology. Taken together, the CCI definition of SCD+ is associated with both WMH burden in the temporal and parietal regions and hippocampal change, suggesting that this definition may be more sensitive to future AD than the ECog definition of SCD+.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Healthy older adults also exhibited no evidence of memory decline, as measured by the Wechsler Memory Scale and no evidence of impaired global cognition as measured by the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) or Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). Following the same procedure as our previous paper (Morrison et al, 2022), four different definitions were used to differentiate participants into cognitively healthy older adults with no subjective cognitive decline (SCD-) or cognitively healthy older adults with subjective cognitive decline (SCD+ ; not to be confused with the SCD plus definition by Jessen et al, 2014). The four groups were defined as:…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation