1993
DOI: 10.1016/0925-4927(93)90029-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional cerebral blood flow during the wisconsin card sorting test in normal subjects studied by xenon-133 dynamic SPECT: Comparison of absolute values, percent distribution values and covariance analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examination of regional cerebral blood flow by single photon emission computed tomography and PET shows activation of the frontal cortex region during performance of theWCST Daniel et al, 1991;Marenco, Coppola, Daniel, Zigun, & Weinberger, 1993;Rezai et al, 1993;Rubin et al, 1991) and the Stroop test (Bench et al, 1993). These studies provide independent confirmation that the tasks selected for assessment of frontal lobe function in this study do depend on the function of the frontal lobes.…”
Section: Tasks Associated With Frontal Lobe Versus Parietal Lobementioning
confidence: 63%
“…Examination of regional cerebral blood flow by single photon emission computed tomography and PET shows activation of the frontal cortex region during performance of theWCST Daniel et al, 1991;Marenco, Coppola, Daniel, Zigun, & Weinberger, 1993;Rezai et al, 1993;Rubin et al, 1991) and the Stroop test (Bench et al, 1993). These studies provide independent confirmation that the tasks selected for assessment of frontal lobe function in this study do depend on the function of the frontal lobes.…”
Section: Tasks Associated With Frontal Lobe Versus Parietal Lobementioning
confidence: 63%
“…This has been especially shown under conditions of mental load (Catafau et al, 1998;Marenco, Coppola, Daniel, Zigun, & Wienberger, 1993;Tien, Schlaepfer, Orr, & Pearlson, 1998). In a minority of studies signi®cant decreases within these brain areas were found (Crespo-Facorro et al, 1999;Edmonstone et al, 1994;Lucey et al, 1995;Martinot et al, 1990). If OCD patients visualized their respective threatening stimuli heightened metabolic rates in the left orbitofrontal cortex, the caudate nucleus and the thalamus were shown (Rauch et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…But unfortunately, most of the research has compared OCD patients with normal controls. These results indicated de®cits in functions which are either mediated by the right hemisphere (Aronowitz et al, 1994;Boone, Ananth, Philpott, Kaur, & Djenderedijan, 1991;Christensen, Kim, Dysken, & Hoover, 1992;Insel, Donnelly, Lalakea, Alterman, & Murphy, 1983;Okasha et al, 2000;Rapoport et al, 1981;Savage et al, 1996;Tallis, Pratt, & Jamani, 1999;Zielinski, Taylor, & Juzwin, 1991) or by frontal-striatal circuits and their related circuits to the basal ganglia (Abbruzzese, Bellode, Ferri, & Scarone, 1993;Abbruzzese, Ferri, & Scarone, 1995;Alarcon, Libb, & Boll, 1994, for review;Baxter, 1990Baxter, , 1991Baxter et al, 1987Baxter et al, , 1988Baxter et al, , 1992Baxter et al, , 1996Breiter et al, 1996;Flor-Henry, Yeudall, Koles, & Howarth, 1979;Head, Bolton, & Hymas, 1989;Hollander, DeCaria, & Liebowitz, 1989;Hymas, Lees, Bolton, Epps, & Head, 1991;Lucey et al, 1997;Martinot et al, 1990;McGuire et al, 1994;Nordahl et al, 1989;Okasha et al, 2000;Savage et al, 1996;Sawle, Hymas, Lees, & Frackowiak, 1991;Saxena, Brody, Schwartz, & Baxter, 1998, for review;Swedo et al, 1989;Weilburg et al, 1989). This has been especially shown under conditions of mental load …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of non-frontal brain regions are activated by the WCST, including the inferior parietal cortex (Berman et al, 1995;Nagahama et al, 1997;Nagahama et al, 1996;Tien et al, 1998), basal ganglia (Mentzel et al, 1998), temporo-parietal association cortex (Konishi et al, 1998), and occipito-temporal, temporal pole, and occipital cortices (Marenco et al, 1993;Nagahama et al, 1996;Ragland et al, 1998). These results are consistent with lesion studies reporting no significant differences between frontal groups and non-frontal, diffuse, or basal ganglia comparison groups (Anderson et al, 1991;Axelrod et al, 1996;Crockett et al, 1986;Eslinger and Grattan, 1993;Grafman et al, 1990;Heaton, 1981;Heaton et al, 1993; Note.…”
Section: Functional Neuroimaging Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%