2020
DOI: 10.17208/jkpa.2020.08.55.4.70
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional Characteristics of Migration Inflow of One-Person Households in the Seoul Metropolitan Area : Focusing on Migration Motivation between Job and Housing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This reflects their propensity to actively participate in society and interact with others. In addition, middleaged and older adults typically show a clear preference for living in urban centers or residential areas away from areas familiar to young people, such as universities [9,11,35,38,39]. However, those at higher risk of social isolation do not exhibit these life-cycle characteristics, are more likely to be rent burdened, and show little preference for accessibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This reflects their propensity to actively participate in society and interact with others. In addition, middleaged and older adults typically show a clear preference for living in urban centers or residential areas away from areas familiar to young people, such as universities [9,11,35,38,39]. However, those at higher risk of social isolation do not exhibit these life-cycle characteristics, are more likely to be rent burdened, and show little preference for accessibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have argued that SPHs are more mobile than other household types, with housing choices based on individual decisions and preferences [2,36]. Several studies have found that SPHs tend to live near universities or employment centers [9][10][11]35,[37][38][39]. Young adults have been shown to have a higher preference for proximity to work and access to public transportation than other groups.…”
Section: Spatial Distribution and Influencing Factors Of Sphsmentioning
confidence: 99%