2004
DOI: 10.1080/003434042000211105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional Convergence in the European Union, 1985- 1999: A Spatial Dynamic Panel Analysis

Abstract: [1985][1986][1987][1988][1989][1990][1991][1992][1993][1994][1995][1996][1997][1998][1999]. So far there is no direct estimator available for dynamic panels with strong spatial dependencies. We propose a two-step procedure, which involves first spatial filtering of the variables to remove the spatial correlation, and application of standard GMM estimators for dynamic panels in a second step. Our results show that ignorance of the spatial correlation leads to potentially misleading results. Applying a system GM… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
85
1
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
85
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…There are now numerous studies that have estimated absolute and conditional beta convergence for the regions, with the more recent ones mainly concentrating on conditional beta convergence. See, for example, Barro and Sala-i- Martin (1991Martin ( , 2004, Armstrong (1995), Evans and Karras (1996), Rey and Montouri (1997), Garofalo and Yamarik (2002), Badinger et al (2004), Egger et al (2006), Benos and Karagiannis (2008), Esposti and Bussoletti (2008), and Tselios (2009). See also the survey of Martin and Sunley (1998).…”
Section: Regional Convergence and The Aggregate Production Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are now numerous studies that have estimated absolute and conditional beta convergence for the regions, with the more recent ones mainly concentrating on conditional beta convergence. See, for example, Barro and Sala-i- Martin (1991Martin ( , 2004, Armstrong (1995), Evans and Karras (1996), Rey and Montouri (1997), Garofalo and Yamarik (2002), Badinger et al (2004), Egger et al (2006), Benos and Karagiannis (2008), Esposti and Bussoletti (2008), and Tselios (2009). See also the survey of Martin and Sunley (1998).…”
Section: Regional Convergence and The Aggregate Production Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Na literatura, Badinger et al (2004) foram os primeiros autores a proporem um procedimento indireto para estimar modelos de painel de dados dinâmicos espaciais. O procedimento é simples e baseia-se em duas etapas, que envolvem primeiro a filtragem espacial das variáveis para remover a correlação espacial e a aplicação tradicional dos estimadores MGM para modelos dinâmicos na segunda etapa (Badinger et al, 2004).…”
Section: Aspectos Metodológicosunclassified
“…O procedimento proposto por Badinger et al (2004) adota a filtragem espacial desenvolvida por Getis e Griffith (2002). Para exemplificar a filtragem espacial, considera-se qualquer variável sob estudo, quer dizer y:…”
Section: Aspectos Metodológicosunclassified
“…The accurate number of years required to avoid short-run variations is still under discussion in the literature (see Temple, 1999, for an analysis). Temple (1999) recommends 5 or 10 years long periods, but we preferred to follow the approach from Badinger et al (2004) k -nearest neighbours' weight matrix has the most fitted to representing spatial interaction of our sample: this specification lead to each region has the same number of neighbouring regions ( k ) including islands on our sample and reduce the heterogeneity problem of regional superficies (Anselin, 2002). Table 1 Descriptive statistics during the whole period.…”
Section: Data Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Working on a dynamic panel specification, Badinger et al (2004) applied a GMM estimator to spatially filtered variables; Elhorst (2005) suggests a maximum likelihood estimation of models that are dynamic both in space and time for regional analysis; Piras and Arbia (2007) extend panel-data models with spatial error autocorrelation for a convergence analysis of EU regions. More precisely the main argument of applying the extended GMM in a spatial context is that it corrects for the endogeneity of the spatial lagged dependent variable and other potentially endogenous explanatory variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%