2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional development through entrepreneurial exaptation: Epistemological displacement, affordances, and collective agency in rural regions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such practices make families and communities less exclusively reliant on the main farming activity, while providing new avenues for income as a hedge against cyclical pressure on the core farming business ( Alsos et al, 2014 ; Carter, 1998 , 2001 ). Processes of bricolage and exaptation are central to these well-documented processes ( Gaddefors et al, 2020 ; Garud et al, 2018 ); yet, unlike exaptation in the technological domain ( Andriani and Cattani, 2016 ; Ching, 2016 ; Dew and Sarasvathy, 2016 ; Garud et al, 2016 ), diversification in the rural context provides the means to establish resilience in the local economy wherein the value is determined as much by system-level resilience as by profitability or the resource-use efficiency of entrepreneurial enterprises. While rural contexts are uniquely informative on these points, there are similar contextual anecdotes emanating from urban areas that provide similarly compelling insights (see Hunt et al, 2019 ), though they are often more difficult to translate to resource-constrained and infrastructure-poor locales.…”
Section: A New Role For Entrepreneurshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such practices make families and communities less exclusively reliant on the main farming activity, while providing new avenues for income as a hedge against cyclical pressure on the core farming business ( Alsos et al, 2014 ; Carter, 1998 , 2001 ). Processes of bricolage and exaptation are central to these well-documented processes ( Gaddefors et al, 2020 ; Garud et al, 2018 ); yet, unlike exaptation in the technological domain ( Andriani and Cattani, 2016 ; Ching, 2016 ; Dew and Sarasvathy, 2016 ; Garud et al, 2016 ), diversification in the rural context provides the means to establish resilience in the local economy wherein the value is determined as much by system-level resilience as by profitability or the resource-use efficiency of entrepreneurial enterprises. While rural contexts are uniquely informative on these points, there are similar contextual anecdotes emanating from urban areas that provide similarly compelling insights (see Hunt et al, 2019 ), though they are often more difficult to translate to resource-constrained and infrastructure-poor locales.…”
Section: A New Role For Entrepreneurshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The myopia of thin contextualisation, as exemplified in the Silicon Valley template, ignores othered spatial manifestations such as rural entrepreneurship (Gaddefors et al, 2020; Hunt et al, 2019). Notably, an important implication of this is the application of evaluative measures involving growth and job creation, which are considered generic and aspatial.…”
Section: The Importance and Neglect Of Space In Entrepreneurship Resementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, organisational thinness pictures a context that offers only a low-road to business networking with limited knowledge-sharing, which makes it necessary to compensate for missing linkages between companies inside and outside the region (Isaksen and Karlsen, 2016). As the empirical literature highlights (Gaddefors et al, 2020;Dubois, 2015), this context is often found with rural-peripheral regions.…”
Section: Organisational Thinness and Business Networkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organisationally thin regions are characterised by weaknesses in their endowment with industry clusters and business networks, and these regions are said to lack the necessary resources (investment, human capital and knowledge) to build sustainable innovation systems. Although organisational thinness can be found across various types of regions, it is most commonly discussed for rural (Gaddefors et al, 2020) and peripheral regions (Dubois, 2015). A common remedy proposed for companies in such regions, particularly SMEs, is access to resources stemming from external actors, for example, through engagement in business networks outside the region (Huggins and Johnston, 2009;Virkkala, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epistemological Displacement, Affordances, and Collective Agency in Rural Regions stresses that "the creation of growth and development in rural regions presents a key challenge for both researchers and policy makers" (Gaddefors J., et al 2020). In their research study, the authors focus on the importance of expanding business as a mechanism for creating regional development in rural areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%