2022
DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2022.854342
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional differences in educational achievement: A replication study of municipality data

Abstract: The current study analyzed the relationships between explanatory variables such as socioeconomic status (SES), migration background (MB), and formal teacher competence, and aggregated grades in the Swedish lower-secondary school context by using aggregated municipality data from 2013, 2018, and 2019. SES indicators had larger effect sizes when data from different years were merged and when the outcome variable was changed to an alternative measure of educational achievement. In one model, the MB variable even … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 56 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned earlier, due to the cross-sectional design, it is not possible to control for participating students' previous academic achievement, effect sizes will be skewed upward, and causal relationships not possible to discern. Moreover, due to the aggregated data, it is not possible to make inferences at the individual or school level (Boman, 2022d). Some may still consider the Lynn and Becker (2019) data set to be unreliable and misguiding (Sear, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned earlier, due to the cross-sectional design, it is not possible to control for participating students' previous academic achievement, effect sizes will be skewed upward, and causal relationships not possible to discern. Moreover, due to the aggregated data, it is not possible to make inferences at the individual or school level (Boman, 2022d). Some may still consider the Lynn and Becker (2019) data set to be unreliable and misguiding (Sear, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%