2012
DOI: 10.1038/oby.2012.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional Differences in Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Gene Expression

Abstract: Adipose tissue located in the viscera is considered to be functionally and metabolically different from that found in the subcutaneous depot. However, subcutaneous adipose tissue in generalized regions is considered to be homogeneous in nature. Affymetrix GeneChip Human Exon 1.0 ST Arrays were used to determine differential gene expression in four subcutaneous adipose depots (upper abdomen, lower abdomen, flank and hip) in normal weight women. A total of 2890/24,409 transcripts were differentially expressed be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This agrees with other reports that suggest abdominal obesity promotes cancer tumorigenicity more than obesity in other bodily locations [38]. The genetic differences between abdominal and non-abdominal adipocytes, as they relate to cancer susceptibility and clinical outcome, have not been fully characterized, although others have found abdominal adipocytes to have higher expression of genes involved in immune responses, insulin signaling and amino acid metabolism [54].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This agrees with other reports that suggest abdominal obesity promotes cancer tumorigenicity more than obesity in other bodily locations [38]. The genetic differences between abdominal and non-abdominal adipocytes, as they relate to cancer susceptibility and clinical outcome, have not been fully characterized, although others have found abdominal adipocytes to have higher expression of genes involved in immune responses, insulin signaling and amino acid metabolism [54].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Indeed, our approach was vindicated in that we identifi ed 73 differentially expressed FCHL genes that also exhibited altered expression in the subcutaneous periumbilical fat of rather younger (38 ± 9.3 years of age), leaner (27 ± 2.4 kg/m 2 ), and healthier Mexican FCHL patients who had somewhat higher total cholesterol (6.8 ± 1.2 mmol/l) and triglyceride (4.7 ± 2.6 mmol/l) levels ( 7 ) than our patients ( Table 1 ), presumably because they were not on treatment with statins. Nevertheless, this gene overlap ( ‫ف‬ 20%) with the Mexican FCHL study is rather modest, which very likely relates to a number of differences between the two studies, including our smaller sample size, different inclusion criteria (e.g., men only), removal of gene expression changes related to FCHL pathogenesis rather than etiology, potential metabolic differences between upper abdominal (current study) and periumbilical (Mexican) fat ( 53,54 ), and the differential effect of a British versus Mexican diet ( 55,56 ) on adipose tissue gene expression ( 57 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also showed increased mRNA expression of adipokines within iWAT. The inguinal fat depot of rodents is similar to the gluteofemoral subcutaneous depot in humans and this fat depot is more sensitive to insulin in humans 97 , 98 , however the effect in rodents has been found to be inconclusive. In obese women, there is increased 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 5 activity within subcutaneous fat depots compared to visceral fat depots indicating increased androgen synthesis within subcutaneous depots.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%