2016
DOI: 10.1080/09540121.2016.1211605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional differences, socio-demographics, and hidden population of HIV/AIDS in India

Abstract: This study examines the prevalence of HIV/AIDS in different regions of India, their socio-demographic indicators, and the presence of hidden population infected with HIV. Secondary data analyzed were obtained from national and international agencies. Considering the prevalence of HIV/AIDS in India, the low-prevalence regions in the last decade have shown a steady increase in recent years. Productive age, urbanization, male gender, lower level of education, minority religions, low income, and mobile occupations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The key population in metropolitan cities including people who inject drugs, men who have sex with men, transgender people, female sex workers, inmates in central jails, migrants, and long-distance truckers are more prevalent in socioeconomically developed places (5, [13][14][15][16][17]. At the same time, migrants in these cities tend to be a carrier for transmission of infection to their origin places (5, 16,18,19). In India, most of the metropolitan cities received migrants from the socioeconomically less developed states including Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, and Madhya Pradesh (19,20).…”
Section: Discussion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The key population in metropolitan cities including people who inject drugs, men who have sex with men, transgender people, female sex workers, inmates in central jails, migrants, and long-distance truckers are more prevalent in socioeconomically developed places (5, [13][14][15][16][17]. At the same time, migrants in these cities tend to be a carrier for transmission of infection to their origin places (5, 16,18,19). In India, most of the metropolitan cities received migrants from the socioeconomically less developed states including Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, and Madhya Pradesh (19,20).…”
Section: Discussion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, migrants in these cities tend to be a carrier for transmission of infection to their origin places (5, 16,18,19). In India, most of the metropolitan cities received migrants from the socioeconomically less developed states including Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, and Madhya Pradesh (19,20). These migrants seem to be a super spreader of infection in their origin places (10, [16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Discussion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Better employment opportunities in big cities result in influx of predominantly young migrants leading to accumulation of HRG population in these districts [38, 5153]. Separation from families, flourishing sex trade, marriages at a later age and availability of money from employment provide opportunities for sexual encounters with multiple partners–both commercial and non-commercial [35, 36, 52]. These conditions coupled with lack of information about HIV prevention and condoms might increase the risk of unsafe sex and chances of HIV acquisition [17, 39, 51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 Since some of these activities could be illegal or are stigmatized, SCYs may experience public harassment and/or police violence. 68 Moreover, these behaviors also initiate psychosocial issues and mental health problems, and place them at risk of accidental injury, malnutrition, and diseases, particularly sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and HIV. 911 SCYs generally have lower levels of education and greater misconceptions about HIV transmission compared to their housed peers 12,13 and do not consider the risk of HIV infection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%