1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf00698740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional distribution of epidermal growth factor, testosterone and dihydrotestosterone in benign prostatic hyperplasia tissue

Abstract: In benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) is found to have a regional distribution, with concentrations in the periurethral zone (where the primitive fibrostromal nodule originates) higher than those of the peripheral subcapsular zone. The aim of the present investigation was to verify whether androgens and epidermal growth factor (EGF) are uniformly distributed from the periurethral to the peripheral zone or whether they show regional differences. Tissue samples, removed by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
11
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results confirm the androgen-dependence of the production of this growth factor, that, in the untreated group, presents a positive linear correlation with tissue DHT (r = 0.658, P < 0.001) and T (r = 0.450, P < 0.01) [21]. This fall in EGF levels may be also due to a competitive inhibition of the binding of residual DHT to the androgen receptors, which is the other possible mechanism of action of Serenoa repens demonstrated by in vitro studies on rat prostatic cells [1][2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results confirm the androgen-dependence of the production of this growth factor, that, in the untreated group, presents a positive linear correlation with tissue DHT (r = 0.658, P < 0.001) and T (r = 0.450, P < 0.01) [21]. This fall in EGF levels may be also due to a competitive inhibition of the binding of residual DHT to the androgen receptors, which is the other possible mechanism of action of Serenoa repens demonstrated by in vitro studies on rat prostatic cells [1][2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This finding is of particular interest if we consider that in BPH tissue the two androgens and EGF present regional variations in their distribution, the highest levels being in the zone adjacent to the urethra, where the primitive nodule originates and where the successive growth processes lead to compression of the urethra, with reduction of urinary flow [6,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, increased signal transduction through EGFr can lead to abnormal cell growth; over-expression of EGFr in vitro has oncogenic potential, and its immunohistochemical over-expression has been reported in BPH and correlated with epithelial cell numbers (Ching et al, 1993;Lubrano et al, 1993;Myers et al, 1993;Giri et al, 1995;Sciarra et al, 1995;Dahiya et al, 1996;De Bellis et al, 1996). Because the over-expression of a gene might be a direct consequence of the presence of several copies of this gene in the genome, besides analyzing the expression levels of EGFr, c-erbB2/ neu and int-2 genes, we also investigated their amplification status in patients with BPH and in normal prostate tissues from organ donors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others, also using immunohistochemical methods, have identified increased levels of EGFr (Mellon et al, 1992;Lubrano et al, 1993;Myers et al, 1993) and of c-erbB2/neu (Mellon et al, 1992) in prostatic adenocarcinoma samples and in BPH, in which overexpression of EGFr and c-erbB2/neu is restricted to epithelial cells (Giri et al, 1995;De Bellis et al, 1996). Over-expression of mRNA levels for EGFr and its ligands, epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor alpha has also been observed in BPH and cell lines (Ching et al, 1993;Sciarra et al, 1995;Dahiya et al, 1996). However, although the status of EGFr and c-erbB2 gene amplification has not been analyzed in any of the above reports, no amplification has been detected in prostate cancer by others (Latil et al, 1994;Fournier et al, 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%