2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional evapotranspiration from a wetland in Central Europe, in a 16-year period without human intervention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Evapotranspiration values of 1.2 mm day -1 were described by Anda et al (2015) and Coaguila et al (2015), corroborating the values of mean annual ET a of the IS of 1.23 mm day -1 in the studied watershed (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Evapotranspiration values of 1.2 mm day -1 were described by Anda et al (2015) and Coaguila et al (2015), corroborating the values of mean annual ET a of the IS of 1.23 mm day -1 in the studied watershed (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Furthermore, ET rates from more northern latitudes (Smid, 1975;Peacock and Hess, 2004;Anda et al 2015) showed similar results to those found in Nebraska, although Zhou and Zhou (2009) found slightly lower mean daily ET rates during the growing season (2.1 mm day -1 ) in northeast China at a similar latitude ( Table 1). The lower rates observed in China compared to results in this study and other sites in Nebraska could be attributed to measurement methods, vegetation characteristics, and/or differences in climate, such as the average annual temperature, which is 3.3 ˚C cooler than the field site in the present study (Mohamed et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…where: ΔW -volume of accumulated sludge, m 3 W sl -volume of sludge coming into the sludge fields, m 3 W f -seepage through bottom and dykes, m 3 P -volume of precipitation, m 3 E -evaporation from water surface, m 3 ET -evapotranspiration, m 3 ΔV -volume of clarified sludge water, m 3 n -number of years.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%