Regional futures in crisis: lived experience and the generative role of intermediaries

Gibson, Chris

doi:10.1080/07293682.2022.2105916

Cited by 9 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 76 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Rather than engaging carefully to envision and plan for an ethical, equitable low carbon future, urgency provides cover for monopoly plays among established corporate miners, as well as quick approvals for disruptive start-ups, while reducing accountability (Hine, Mayes, and Hurst 2022). As in the infrastructure and urban development sectors, 'state significant infrastructure' designation and unsolicited/market-led proposals processes through which critical minerals projects are approved obfuscate regulatory and financial dealings, with impact assessment studies frequently now succeeding rather than preceding initial approval (Gibson 2022;White, Legacy, and Haughton 2022).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Critical Minerals: rethinking extractivism?

Hine¹,

Gibson²,

Mayes³

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Acceleration in funding and political support for critical minerals industry development is linked to securing resource supply chains essential to low carbon futures. This commentary reviews the Australian critical minerals agenda and scrutinises urgency claims engulfing the ‘rush’ to explore and extract critical minerals. First, we define critical minerals and examine their ‘criticality’ in relation to decarbonisation and geopolitical motivations. The idea that the emergent industry is premised on an ethics of climate action conflicts with evidence that reputational risk and market shifts are driving companies to pivot from traditional mining. Second, we problematise urgency claims fuelling the critical minerals ‘rush’, arguing that crisis narratives and regulatory fast-tracking mask serious ethical, social, and environmental justice concerns, while neglecting material blockages. We separate the idea of producing materials central to low carbon futures from localised social and environmental impacts of their extraction and processing, in order to raise concerns over the absolution work performed by urgency claims. The burgeoning critical minerals industry presents an epochal moment to reconstitute mining differently to meet social and environmental justice goals. Instead, as currently imagined, it threatens to extend a frontier mentality and existing models of extractivism, reproducing colonial-capitalist legacies. We conclude by advocating for counter-urgencies that foreground materiality and view critical minerals and decarbonisation as policy commons, enabling debates on the shape and ethics of the critical minerals industry before it is fully established. Geographers, presently less visible than industry advocates in the critical minerals discourse, are well positioned to contribute to such debates.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%