2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2009.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional growth estimates of Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua: Applications of the maximum likelihood GROTAG model to tagging data in the Gulf of Maine (USA/Canada) region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reference lengths for α and β which are well represented by the length distribution of the tagging data should be chosen (Francis, 1988a). In our study, the 5th percentile value of L 1 measurements was adopted for α and the 95 th percentile value of L 1 measurements was adopted for β (as in Tallack, 2009; see also Mion et al., 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Reference lengths for α and β which are well represented by the length distribution of the tagging data should be chosen (Francis, 1988a). In our study, the 5th percentile value of L 1 measurements was adopted for α and the 95 th percentile value of L 1 measurements was adopted for β (as in Tallack, 2009; see also Mion et al., 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GROTAG model was selected since it incorporates individual variation in growth rate, is suitable for handling large datasets (Tallack, 2009) and has been successfully applied to tagging data to estimate growth rates of cod (McQueen et al., 2019; Mion et al., 2020; Tallack, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The two management units consist of: 1) cod from Georges Bank, offshore of Cape Cod, and in the waters of southern New England; and 2) a group consisting of cod from the western, central, and eastern GoM (Fig 1). However, genetic data [2328], differences in growth rates [29,30], timing of spawning [19,31], larval dispersal patterns [32,33], movement patterns [18,34–36], spawning site fidelity [37–39], and differences in life history strategy [40,41] all confirm that there is biocomplexity in US cod that conflicts with the stock designations (for a review see REF 20). The misalignment of stock designations with this biocomplexity is implicated as a contributing factor in the failure of these stocks to rebuild despite decades of intensive management [42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, results of this study shed some light on the connectivity between GOM cod stock and the two neighbor stocks (i.e., GB stock on the south and the 4× stock on the east). Limited inter‐stock mixing keeps these stocks distinct from each other in demographics and genetics (Miller and Tallack, ; Tallack, ). The limited exchange of adult cod is often attributed to natal homing or spawning site fidelity, despite a lack of the underlying mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%