2017
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional inequalities in self-reported conditions and non-communicable diseases in European countries: Findings from the European Social Survey (2014) special module on the social determinants of health

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data used in the study originates from the nationally representative 2014 South African Social Attitudes Survey (SASAS), which fielded the survey module on social determinants of health in the European Social Survey (ESS7) in a developing country context [27]. This survey module on the social determinants of health has been extensively used to document health inequalities in European countries [3840], including disparities in mental health [41–43], emphasising its suitability for this study. SASAS 2014 received ethical clearance from the HSRC and face-to-face interviews were conducted with a cross-sectional sample of 3108 consenting individuals aged 16 years and older.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data used in the study originates from the nationally representative 2014 South African Social Attitudes Survey (SASAS), which fielded the survey module on social determinants of health in the European Social Survey (ESS7) in a developing country context [27]. This survey module on the social determinants of health has been extensively used to document health inequalities in European countries [3840], including disparities in mental health [41–43], emphasising its suitability for this study. SASAS 2014 received ethical clearance from the HSRC and face-to-face interviews were conducted with a cross-sectional sample of 3108 consenting individuals aged 16 years and older.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All regional data were classified at the second Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics (NUTS-2) level (with a typical population of 800,000 to 3 million) apart from Germany and United Kingdom, as for these countries the ESS data were only available at the NUTS-1 level (population 3–7 million). The NUTS is a hierarchical system for dividing up the economic territory of the European Union based on population, country administrative divisions or geographical units ( Thomson et al, 2017 ). The regional data were matched with the individual level ESS data using the corresponding NUTS code.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We included a range of health outcomes present in Round 7 of the ESS, these included: self-reported heart or circulation problems, high blood pressure, diabetes, self-rated health, depression and obesity. The regional distribution for these outcomes has been described previously ( Thomson et al, 2017 ). As a falsification test we also tested an outcome (allergies) that we did not expect to be associated with individual or regional level employment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier analyses indicated somewhat higher parental socio‐economic status (SES) among the participating families compared to the national mean . Norway is a highly egalitarian society , and SES‐based differences in parental and young people's health‐related behaviour are generally small compared to other European countries . However, further studies on more SES‐diverse samples are warranted.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%