2010
DOI: 10.2478/s10105-010-0013-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional Inequalities in the New European Union Member-States: Is There a ‘Population Size’ Effect?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most commonly used include the Gini coefficient and the coefficient of variation which were used by Wostner (2005, In Felsenstein, Portnov, 2005a, Puljiz, Maleković (2007), Kallioras (2010), Smętkowski (2013) and others. For purposes of this research were also used just mentioned factors.…”
Section: Methodological Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used include the Gini coefficient and the coefficient of variation which were used by Wostner (2005, In Felsenstein, Portnov, 2005a, Puljiz, Maleković (2007), Kallioras (2010), Smętkowski (2013) and others. For purposes of this research were also used just mentioned factors.…”
Section: Methodological Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kallioras (2010) shows that convergence trends are conditioned on the size of the regional economies, pointing to the possibility of club convergence. Direct evidence for this, with strong regional convergence within, and persistent divergence across clubs, has been offered recently by Artelaris et al (2010; for within-country clubs) and earlier by Fischer and Stirböck (2006;for cross-country clubs).…”
Section: Regional Growth In Cee and The Wider National-development Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kallioras (2010) shows that NC results are conditioned on the size of the regional economies, with evidence of divergence when population size is taken into account and evidence of convergence otherwise. 4 Given that population is typically higher in more advanced and more dynamic regions, these findings can be interpreted as evidence signalling intra-country polarisation and, possibly, club convergence: smaller (and poorer) regions tend to converge to their own steadystate, but larger regions tend to follow different, more dynamic, paths.…”
Section: Transition Accession and Regional Growth In The Ceecsmentioning
confidence: 99%