2003
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.377001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional Inequality in India: A Fresh Look

Abstract: There are concerns that regional inequality in India has increased after the economic reforms of 1991. This concern is supported by various statistical analyses. In this paper, we show that the conclusions are sensitive to what measures of attainment are used. In particular, human development indices do not show the same increase in regional inequality. Furthermore, looking at consumption and credit indicators for regions disaggregated below the state level also suggests that inequality trends may not be as ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Kerala is a long-term example of positive public policy interventions, with high life expectancy and literacy rates. Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Tamil Nadu are all cases of Indian states where significant improvements in health and nutrition have recently been achieved (Drèze, 2004;Singh et al, 2003). And, as noted earlier, Bangladesh's achievements in certain human development measures outstrip those of India, indicating the importance of policy priorities and implementation.…”
Section: Inequality and Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Kerala is a long-term example of positive public policy interventions, with high life expectancy and literacy rates. Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Tamil Nadu are all cases of Indian states where significant improvements in health and nutrition have recently been achieved (Drèze, 2004;Singh et al, 2003). And, as noted earlier, Bangladesh's achievements in certain human development measures outstrip those of India, indicating the importance of policy priorities and implementation.…”
Section: Inequality and Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…I am grateful to Surjit Bhalla for both these points. 25 For a summary of studies on regional inequality in India, as well as some newer, disaggregated results, see Singh et al (2003).…”
Section: Inequality and Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Economic liberalization in the 1980s and 1990s coincided with, and probably contributed to, increased regional inequality (e.g., Ahluwalia, 2002;Singh et al, 2003;Singh and Srinivasan, 2005). The reforms of the 1990s gave state governments more freedom to make policies independently, and those states which had favorable initial conditions were more able to attract new capital to their jurisdictions.…”
Section: Federalism Distribution and Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 These variables were petrol sales, diesel sales, bank credit, bank deposits and cereal production. 6 Singh et al (2003) found no strong evidence of convergence or divergence using each of the five variables as indicators of economic activity, but it was clear that western and southern states had done better over the 1990s. This paper extends the Singh et al (2003) results in two directions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%