2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-007-9117-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional land-cover conversion in the U.S. upper Midwest: magnitude of change and limited recovery (1850–1935–1993)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
92
1
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
92
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Agriculture-grassland land cover increased from 29.5 to 38.6%. This is a notable increase compared to regionwide decline (Rhemtulla et al 2007), associated with farm abandonment (Carstensen 1958). Furthermore, agricultural land increased despite a 34% population decrease from 11,916 in 1920 to 7856 in 1950.…”
Section: Frontier/euro-american Settlement/imposed Assimilation (1860mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agriculture-grassland land cover increased from 29.5 to 38.6%. This is a notable increase compared to regionwide decline (Rhemtulla et al 2007), associated with farm abandonment (Carstensen 1958). Furthermore, agricultural land increased despite a 34% population decrease from 11,916 in 1920 to 7856 in 1950.…”
Section: Frontier/euro-american Settlement/imposed Assimilation (1860mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The landscape has experienced pronounced changes in land cover over the last century and half, as much of the savanna and prairie were replaced by agricultural lands (Rhemtulla et al, 2007) and the suppression of fire promoted a greater extent of closed-canopy forests (Curtis, 1959). Currently the landscape is composed primarily of agricultural lands and deciduous forest (Fry et al, 2011).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we draw on 2 remarkable historical surveys, the first conducted before widespread EuroAmerican settlement, and the second at the period of peak agricultural clearing, to reconstruct fineresolution historical vegetation and land-use data. Using a case study from Wisconsin where primary forests were almost entirely cut by the turn of the 20th century and have since undergone considerable regrowth (13), we use these data to compare current pools of aboveground live forest carbon (AGC) with those before settlement and at the period of peak agricultural conversion. Because Wisconsin is composed of 2 distinct biomes-formerly dense forests in the north and former prairiesavanna in the south-each with differing land-use histories, we also compare trajectories of change in carbon stocks and the potential for future sequestration through both forest recovery and afforestation on current agricultural lands.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although former savanna and prairie ecosystems stored little carbon aboveground, they likely stored in the range of 100 MgC/ha in the soil, 30-35% of which may have been lost on conversion to agriculture (28,29). This loss in soil C belowground is of a similar magnitude (per ha) to the gain in aboveground carbon from forest ingrowth elsewhere in southern Wisconsin, but given that 4 times more prairie and savanna was converted to agriculture (for a potential loss of Ϸ120 Tg of soil C) than subject to forest ingrowth (13), there was almost certainly a net loss in total carbon in southern Wisconsin (30).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%