Regional level in the function of mitigating negative demographic trends in rural areas of Serbia: Case study of the district of Zajecar

Abstract

Long-term marginalization of villages has caused negative demographic trends in rural areas of Serbia, primarily through forceful de-population, unfavorable demographic structures and other structural problems. The term ?extinction? is the most often related to the recent appearance of demographic shrinkage and economic decline of villages. According to the last population census (2011), 13 settlements without permanent inhabitants have been recorded. The fact that about 1/3 of all settlements in rural Serbia is sparsely inhabited (less than 20 inh/km2) indicates that scales of demographic decline impacts are yet to be seen. The Spatial Plan of the Republic of Serbia (2010) advocates polycentric and balanced regional development. Creation of adequate instruments to mitigate demographic decline in rural areas requires clear definition of regional territorial units. Are they going to be NUTS 3 level, or functional urban areas, as spatially and functionally integrated areas which represent more suitable choice for addressing the issue of demographic and economic decline, or should concrete answers be looked for at the level of identified rural regions [Spatial Plan of the Republic of Serbia, 2010; National Program for Rural Development, 2011]? This paper will research these issues in the District of Zajecar with a good practice in Germany. [Projekat Ministarstva nauke Republike Srbije, br. 47007]

Regional Inequalities Population of Montenegro with Overview of Regional Indicators

“…Our research evidence based on research Drobnjaković et al (2014) indicating that the rural area typology previously presented is based on regional development priorities dividing Montenegro in large territorial units. Regarding the heterogeneity of these rural areas, main guidelines to the regional development can be only general in their nature, but not specific.…”

Functional dependence of settlements and its demographic component in the transition phase of the daily urban system

“…When defining it, the author did not intend to give a universal model of DUSs, but he believed that its application can contribute to the induction of relevant theoretical assumptions for the delimitation of urban systems in Serbia (Tošić & Nevenić, 2007). Through numerous scientific and professional research, this has been proven and applied in the majority of settlements in Serbia (Drobnjaković et al, 2014;Filipović, 2020;Filipović et al, 2013;Krunić et al, 2009Krunić et al, , 2011; Regionalni prostorni plan opština Južnog Pomoravlja, 83/2010; Regionalni prostorni plan Timočke krajine (Borski i Zaječarski okrug), 51/2011; Regionalni prostorni plan za područje Kolubarskog i Mačvanskog upravnog okruga, 11/2015; Regionalni prostorni plan za područje Zlatiborskog i Moravičkog upravnog okruga, 1/2013; Tošić et al, 2009;Živanović et al, 2021, and other). It is based on research into the spatial manifestation of daily mobility and its impact on the socioeconomic transformation of the city region and its regional system, so that, in addition to the demographic, it also has functional and spatial components, unlike previously used models (Krunić, 2012a).…”

Links Between Demographic Changes and Transformation of Capital's Urban System

“…The categorized values of the share of commuters, who travel to the labor center every day in the total number of workers, according to the place of residence, are qualified by an appropriate name that suggests their dependence on the function of work. The model has been successfully applied within various types of research, covering most of the territory of the Republic of Serbia [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25].…”