2008
DOI: 10.1177/0075424208316648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional Phonetic Differentiation in Standard Canadian English

Abstract: Taking as a point of departure the preliminary view of regional phonetic differentiation in Canadian English developed by the Atlas of North American English, this article presents data from a new acoustic-phonetic study of regional variation in Canadian English carried out by the author at McGill University. While the Atlas analyzes mostly spontaneous speech data from thirty-three speakers covering a broad social range, the present study analyzes word list data from a larger number of speakers (eighty-six) dr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
99
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
99
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The alternative hypothesis is that there are differences in the vowel space area. If the alternative hypothesis is corrected as studies from English and other languages suggest (e.g., Labov, 1994;Labov et al, 2006;Boberg, 2008;Gross et al, 2016), we expect significant effects of the variety on the F1 and F2.…”
Section: This Studymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The alternative hypothesis is that there are differences in the vowel space area. If the alternative hypothesis is corrected as studies from English and other languages suggest (e.g., Labov, 1994;Labov et al, 2006;Boberg, 2008;Gross et al, 2016), we expect significant effects of the variety on the F1 and F2.…”
Section: This Studymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Labov et al (2006), based on a telephone survey of 1-4 speakers per city, proposes that Canada is made up of three dialect areas, of which the Canadian West and Ontario make up one area. Boberg (2008) however argues that this large dialect region should be broken down further, proposing a more fine-grained view, with five dialect areas within Canada, differentiating Ontario from the Prairies from British Columbia. His work is based on a comparison of a number of phonetic phenomena among university students from across Canada attending McGill University in Montreal.…”
Section: English In the Canadian Prairiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raising of /ae/ before g The variation in the phonetic realization of /ae/, sometimes called 'short a' (Boberg, 2008) in Canada is somewhat complicated. On the one hand, /ae/ is widely reported as lowering and retracting towards /a/, as part of the widelystudied Canadian shift (Clarke et al, 1995;Esling and Warkentyne, 1993;Hagiwara, 2006;Hoffman, 2010;Roeder, 2012;Roeder and Jarmasz, 2010;Sadlier-Brown and Tamminga, 2008), which is argued to be in reaction to the merger of the lower back vowels /ɑ/ and /ɔ/, a characteristic of most varieties of Canadian English (Clarke et al, 1995;Labov et al, 2006).…”
Section: English In the Canadian Prairiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Production data is analyzed for three distinct dialect regions of North America: Western Canadian English collected in Edmonton, Alberta; Inland Northern English, collected in Kalamazoo, Michigan; and Southern English collected in Dallas, Texas. (Dialect labels adopted from Boberg 2008and Labov et al 2006. Results from modified natural and synthetic speech supporting the relevance of VISC in perception are also summarized.…”
Section: Structure Of the Chaptermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 This specification was based on measurements of formant frequencies from relatively 1 Following Nearey and Assmann (1986), I will use the term Western Canadian English to refer to a combination of what Boberg (2008) refers to as the Prairie and the British Columbia dialects. For all of the Canadian samples discussed in this chapter, the majority were likely Prairie dialect speakers, primarily from Alberta.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%