2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2018.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional prevalences of Borrelia burgdorferi, Borrelia bissettiae, and Bartonella henselae in Ixodes affinis, Ixodes pacificus and Ixodes scapularis in the USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All types of ticks were found to contain Bartonella DNA, although in varying percentages and locations. A survey regarding ticks from 16 states of the United States revealed that the overall prevalence of B. henselae in Ixodes ticks was 2.5% [23]. In Austria, Bartonella spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All types of ticks were found to contain Bartonella DNA, although in varying percentages and locations. A survey regarding ticks from 16 states of the United States revealed that the overall prevalence of B. henselae in Ixodes ticks was 2.5% [23]. In Austria, Bartonella spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of different tick species as vectors for Bartonella is still a hot topic in the scientific literature, with approximately equal numbers of scientists/papers supporting and rejecting a pivotal role for ticks as vectors (Angelakis et al 2010;Telford and Wormser 2010;Billeter et al 2008Billeter et al , 2012. There are numerous papers reporting various frequencies for the detection of Bartonella DNA in ticks (Angelakis et al 2010;Bonnet et al 2013;Maggi et al 2018), including both Bartonella species typically encountered in rodents and Bartonella species of public health significance, such as B. henselae (Maggi et al 2018;Földvári et al 2016;Reye et al 2013;Rar et al 2005b). Despite these studies there are still no unequivocally convincing experimental or epidemiological studies providing conclusive evidence that bartonellae are transmitted by ticks (Telford and Wormser 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparently, there is a weak association, or more often no association, between 'tick factors' (tick seasonality, tick foci, occurrence of borreliosis) and the occurrence of bartonellosis or seroconversion in humans (Telford and Wormser 2010;Zając et al 2015;Muller et al 2016). The majority of published findings on the detection of Bartonella in ticks is based on DNA detection (not on bacterial cultures) and these mostly report low prevalence (0.5-9%) in questing hard ticks, including D. reticulatus (Bonnet et al 2013;Reye et al 2013;Muller et al 2016;Maggi et al 2018). Such low prevalence of about 0.5-1% is not compatible with a key role for ticks of this species as vectors and should be interpreted more as accidental findings, without a crucial role in epidemiology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 38 spp. or subspecies have been described, 18 of which have been associated with an expanding spectrum of human diseases 4‐6 . Bartonella quintana has been detected in 4000‐year‐old human remains, representing the oldest evidence of this infection to human beings 7 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fleas, biting flies and ticks, and potentially spiders 5,10,11 are known to transmit various Bartonella spp. to animals and humans.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%