“…Specifically, the landslide crown showed steep vertical deformation at the top zone reaching 1 m. After 3 days, the aftershock caused landslide reactivation to the west (the growth of the landslide), mainly at the same location of the landslide crown with an increment in the downward subsidence to be 2 m. Vertical velocity of −30 mm/year, and the flanks showed lateral shear movement causing tilting and damage to the inhabitants' building, providing this region with a horizontal displacement rate of −10 mm/year to the west. Although the landslide's toe (found at the accumulation zone) exhibited arc‐shaped fissures, its dominant direction tended to be E‐W displacement at a rate approximately −20 mm/year due to radial cracks (see Figures 6 and 7) (Intrieri, Frodella, Raspini, Bardi, & Tofani, 2020; Meng et al, 2020; Peng, Xu, Liu, et al, 2018). The velocity profile was plotted with the geological cross section shown in Figure 10a, considering the thickness of the clay layer (150 m depth) and the characteristics of being affected by the repeating wet–dry seasons (Figure 11a; North et al, 2017).…”