Petroleum Systems in "Rift" Basins 2015
DOI: 10.5724/gcs.15.34.0372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional Rift Structure of the Western Black Sea Basin: Map-View Kinematics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A certain combination of these effects could either improve or degrade the pre-drill risk profile of a hydrocarbon exploration target (e.g. Macgregor, 1995;Turner and Williams, 2004;Cooper and Warren, 2010;Bevan and Moustafa, 2012;Tari et al, 2020). Failure to recognize the impact of inversion on a basin's geologic evolution can have a disastrous impact on an exploration program.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A certain combination of these effects could either improve or degrade the pre-drill risk profile of a hydrocarbon exploration target (e.g. Macgregor, 1995;Turner and Williams, 2004;Cooper and Warren, 2010;Bevan and Moustafa, 2012;Tari et al, 2020). Failure to recognize the impact of inversion on a basin's geologic evolution can have a disastrous impact on an exploration program.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the Andrusov Ridge is interpreted as a marginal ridge associated with the opening of 79 the western basin along the West Crimean transform fault [Tari et al, 2015]. The 80 Archangelsky Ridge was formed by the opening of the Sinop Trough, which is linked 81 to the western basin and is interpreted to have opened in Cretaceous to Palaeocene 82 times [Espurt et al, 2014;Robinson et al, 1996], with ongoing extension into the 83…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been widely believed that at the level of the syn-rift sequence the northern WBSB and northern EBSB are bounded from their margins, including the Andrusov Ridge and Shatskiy High, by normal faults, which were understood to have never been inverted after the rifting stage ceased, e.g. [Finetti et al, 1988;Nikishin et al, 1998Nikishin et al, , 2001Nikishin et al, , 2012Nikishin et al, , 2015aStarostenko et al, 2004;Shillington et al, 2009Shillington et al, , 2017Okay, Nikishin, 2015;Tari et al, 2015]. It means that the architecture of the two basins did not considerably change since the beginning of the post-rift stage.…”
Section: Sorokin Trough and Marine Continuation Of The Crimean Folds mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Are the WBSB and EBSB originally (sub) oceanic basins that are separated by the Andrusov Ridge? Tectonic and geodynamic models of the Black Sea over the past decades usually consider both WBSB and EBSB as originally separate back-arc rift basins that even could reach the stage of forming the oceanic or suboceanic crust and further evolved as deep marine basins [Neprochnov et al, 1970;Letouzey et al, 1977;Zonenshain, Le Pichon, 1986;Görür, 1988;Finetti et al, 1988;Okay et al, 1994;Spadini et al, 1996Spadini et al, , 1997Ro binson, Kerusov, 1997;Nikishin et al, 1998Nikishin et al, , 2001Nikishin et al, , 2012Nikishin et al, , 2015aStarostenko et al, 2004;Scott et al, 2009;Shillington et al, 2009Shillington et al, , 2017Stephenson, Schellart, 2010;Munteanu et al, 2011Munteanu et al, , 2017Graham et al, 2013;Okay, Nikishin, 2015;Tari et al, 2015;Sosson et al, 2016;Monteleone et al, 2019]. Most of these models are usually based on the view that the present Andrusov Ridge and Shatskiy High are stable and extended uplifted blocks that originally formed during rifting stage(s) and have a moderately thinned continental crust (but thicker than the crust beneath the deep basins).…”
Section: Base Of Cretaceous Syn-riftmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation