2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.11.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional scale flood modeling using NEXRAD rainfall, GIS, and HEC-HMS/RAS: a case study for the San Antonio River Basin Summer 2002 storm event

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
190
0
10

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 382 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(27 reference statements)
7
190
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…If inflows are obtained by hydrologic modelling, we can call it a hydrologic and hydraulic model coupling. Some examples of coupling have already been detailed in the literature (see, for example, Knebl et al, 2005;Whiteaker et al, 2006;Lian et al, 2007;Biancamaria et al, 2009;Bonnifait et al, 2009;Montanari et al, 2009;Mejia and Reed, 2011;Kim et al, 2012;Lerat et al, 2012). A single application concerns a catchment prone to fast floods: the study of Bonnifait et al (2009), which proposes a coupling of the hydrologic n-TOPMODELs model to the CARIMA hydraulic model.…”
Section: O Laganier Et Al: a Coupling Of Hydrologic And Hydraulic Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If inflows are obtained by hydrologic modelling, we can call it a hydrologic and hydraulic model coupling. Some examples of coupling have already been detailed in the literature (see, for example, Knebl et al, 2005;Whiteaker et al, 2006;Lian et al, 2007;Biancamaria et al, 2009;Bonnifait et al, 2009;Montanari et al, 2009;Mejia and Reed, 2011;Kim et al, 2012;Lerat et al, 2012). A single application concerns a catchment prone to fast floods: the study of Bonnifait et al (2009), which proposes a coupling of the hydrologic n-TOPMODELs model to the CARIMA hydraulic model.…”
Section: O Laganier Et Al: a Coupling Of Hydrologic And Hydraulic Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the "Standard for hydrological information and hydrological forecasting (GB/T 22482-2008)," in this work we proposed four model performance classes as a guidance on reference Nash coefficient range, which were denoted as Unsatisfactory (Nash coefficient < 0.5), Acceptable (0.5 ≤ Nash coefficient < 0.7), Good (0.7 ≤ Nash coefficient < 0.9), or Very good (Nash coefficient ≥ 0.9) [48]. The Nash coefficients of 19 Table 10 illustrates that the probability of the model fit being considered Unsatisfactory, Acceptable, Good, and Very good was 0%, 16.67%, 83.33%, and 0%, respectively. So the calculation of rainfall losses was feasible.…”
Section: Calculation Of Losses In Sub-basinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model is a proven tool for simulating runoff that is suitable in general geographical conditions (Knebl, Yang, Hutchison, and Maidment, 2005, McColl and Aggett, 2007, Wan and Yang, 2007 and widely used in research and application practice due to its free availability.…”
Section: Application Of Hec-hms Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%