Proceedings of the 2nd Unconventional Resources Technology Conference 2014
DOI: 10.15530/urtec-2014-1934959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional Sequence Stratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous La Luna Formation in the Magdalena Valley Basin, Colombia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…De hecho, hasta el mismo Morales y The Colombian Petroleum Industry (1958,653) aceptan que la Formación La Luna de Venezuela es distinta a la de Colombia, cuando afirma que "However, in Colombia, the formation can be subdivided into three members the Salada, Pujamana and Galembo". Además, está totalmente justificado el rango de formación para las unidades Salada, Pujamana y Galembo, pues han sido ampliamente reconocidas y cartografiadas, tanto en superficie como en el subsuelo, en todo el VMM, es decir, mucho más allá de sus localidades tipo en el sector de El Tablazo y sus alrededores (Taborda 1965;Ward et al 1973;Maughan et al 1979;Ballesteros et al 2013;Galvis et al 2014;Moreno-Sánchez 2019).…”
Section: Historia De La Nomenclatura Estratigráfica Formación La Lunaunclassified
“…De hecho, hasta el mismo Morales y The Colombian Petroleum Industry (1958,653) aceptan que la Formación La Luna de Venezuela es distinta a la de Colombia, cuando afirma que "However, in Colombia, the formation can be subdivided into three members the Salada, Pujamana and Galembo". Además, está totalmente justificado el rango de formación para las unidades Salada, Pujamana y Galembo, pues han sido ampliamente reconocidas y cartografiadas, tanto en superficie como en el subsuelo, en todo el VMM, es decir, mucho más allá de sus localidades tipo en el sector de El Tablazo y sus alrededores (Taborda 1965;Ward et al 1973;Maughan et al 1979;Ballesteros et al 2013;Galvis et al 2014;Moreno-Sánchez 2019).…”
Section: Historia De La Nomenclatura Estratigráfica Formación La Lunaunclassified
“…Since then, researchers have tried to identify three members in La Luna Formation, creating difficulties in the identification of the unit and major correlation problems; for example, Casadiego & Rios (2016) indicated that the "pujamana" member of other authors corresponds to the "galembo" member at the Aguablanca section W of Bucaramanga. The enormous thickness of approximately 3000 feet from cores reported by Galvis-Portilla et al (2014) also suggests that the authors may have included strata from more than one unit in their definition of La Luna Formation. The thickness of the Turonian to Santonian limestones exposed at the type locality of La Luna Formation in Venezuela and in the rest of the basin in Colombia (Guerrero, ) reaches a maximum measured thickness of 700 to 900 feet, so it is difficult to believe that the unit could reach 2500 to 3000 feet in oil wells.…”
Section: Toc and Thermal Maturitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all three units, neighboring areas around the et al (2019). Petrographic data suggest that most of the quartz in this source rocks is related to diagenetic processes rather than its depositional environment (e.g., Acevedo et al, 2012a;Galvis-Portilla et al, 2014). In all cases, clays content is lower than 40%, suggesting, that most of the units have an excellent brittleness quality which might help in future completion designs, also agreeing previously published petrophysical models which proposes at least two landing zones within the Salada and Galembo formations (e.g., Piedrahita and Aguilera, 2017a;Veiga et al, 2023).…”
Section: Petrophysics and Pore Pressure Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%