Regional Variation in Risk and Time Preferences: Evidence from a Large-scale Field Experiment in Rural Uganda

Abstract

Experiments measuring risk and time preferences in developing countries have tended to have relatively small samples and geographically concentrated sampling. This largescale field experiment uses a Holt-Laury mechanism to elicit the preferences of 1289 randomly selected subjects from 94 villages covering six out of seven agro-climatic zones across rural Uganda. As in previous studies we find evidence of risk aversion and loss aversion amongst most subjects. In addition we find significant heterogeneity in risk attitudes across agro-climatic zones. Especially, the farmers in the agro-climatically least favourable zone, the uni-modal rainfall zone, are the most risk averse, loss averse and impatient. We also find significant relationships between risk attitudes and village level predictors such as the distance to town and the road conditions. After controlling for the village level factors, we find that the level of schooling still positively correlates with the individual's level of loss tolerance and patience. The main results are not altered by allowing for probability weighting in subjects' choices. Overall the results provide clear evidence that within one country there may be significant regional variations in risk and time attitudes. We conjecture that the agro-climatic conditions that affect farmers' livelihoods may also affect their risk and time preferences and village level development in infrastructure could improve the household perception of investment related policies.

Mobile Money, Individuals’ Payments, Remittances, and Investments: Evidence from the Ashanti Region, Ghana

“…Answer option A was fixed for all of the questions, while option B was increased by units of GH¢2.00. We used the discount rate at the game one switching point and the discount rate at the game two switching point to calculate the present bias of the individual [31].…”

Experimental Measure of Rural Household Risk Preference: The Case of the SLCP Area in Northern Shaanxi, China

“…As estimated in other similar studies, the risk aversion level is 0.68-0.97 in the United States of America (Holt and Laury 2002), 0.68-0.71 in India (Binswanger 1980), 0.81-2.00 in Zambia (Wik et al 2004 as cited in Tanaka et al 2014), 0.6 in Vietnam (Tanaka et al 2010), and 0.48 in other provinces of China (Liu 2013). The level of loss aversion is 3.93 in Uganda (Tanaka et al 2014) and 2.50-3.00 in other provinces of China (Liu, 2013). The overall average level of loss aversion in our research is 2.52, which is also lower than other estimates of loss aversion levels.…”

“…A detailed description of the Holt-Laury mechanism is presented later in this paper. Tanaka et al (2014) conducted a similar field experiment that covered all of Uganda. They divided the country into several areas according to the local landform, rainfall capacity, and crop.…”

Risk aversion in agricultural water management investments in Northern Ghana: experimental evidence

“…This is intuitive in the sense that we would expect people in villages that are closer to local markets to have more access to information, resulting in more risk‐neutral preferences. Local environment. Risk preferences may differ significantly across agricultural climatic zones, proving that participants in the experiment were affected by regional factors and background risks posed by the local environment, as found by Tanaka and Munro () in Uganda. Farmers in the agro‐climatically least favorable zone that receives less rainfall on average and is more prone to drought (Nyangua) are the most risk averse. Cultural factors.…”