1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf00395555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional variation in skin blood flow response to hypoglycaemia in Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients without complications

Abstract: Body temperature falls during hypoglycaemia, perhaps as a protective mechanism. To test the hypothesis that the skin blood flow response to hypoglycaemia is specifically designed to facilitate heat loss we studied both nutritional blood flow and arteriovenous shunting of blood in skin during prolonged, controlled hypoglycaemia in man. We studied eight otherwise healthy, male, Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients. Under Biostator control blood glucose was clamped at 8.0 (7.9-8.9), mmol/l (median and ran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, during recovery, Ts decreased on the fingertips, but only in the aware group. Our results are in accordance with a study from Wiles et al [25] demonstrating that finger blood flow remains high during hypoglycaemia in patients with type 1 diabetes despite a decrease in interdigital skin blood flow. It was only in the recovery period that the finger blood flow fell.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…However, during recovery, Ts decreased on the fingertips, but only in the aware group. Our results are in accordance with a study from Wiles et al [25] demonstrating that finger blood flow remains high during hypoglycaemia in patients with type 1 diabetes despite a decrease in interdigital skin blood flow. It was only in the recovery period that the finger blood flow fell.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…They found a decrease in LDF dur ing hypoglycemia, while we did not record any change in LDF at all. Furthermore, Wiles et al [21] postulate that they have measured 'capillary blood How' with the laser Doppler technique, which is not the case as has been dem onstrated in several previous studies [15,16]. When used on the skin the laser Doppler technique measures the blood cell movements in all microvascular compartments, and the signal is predominantly generated by blood flow in the subpapillary vascular bed [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, different protocols and skin areas have been used in these studies. Wiles et al [21] used the finger skin web in diabetic patients and did not investigate any con trol group. Consequently, it is not possible to compare their and our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several potential areas where responses in diabetic patients may differ from those of normal subjects: the sympathoadrenal response to hypoglycaemia is attenuated in diabetes of long duration [4], diabetic patients have abnormal vascular responses to a number of different stresses [5], more specifically, there is evidence that skin vascular responses to hypoglycaemia may be abnormal [6] and abnormal sweating is well documented [7]. We have therefore examined the thermoregulatory responses to sustained hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia and euglycaemia in IDDM of short and long duration in a single blind, experimental protocol.…”
Section: : 689~596]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is highlighted by the observation that the early vasodilator response to hypoglycaemia in the skin of the forehead and forearm of healthy control subjects was absent in diabetic patients [24]. A differential effect of hypoglycaemia on skin blood flow in diabetic patients was reported by Wiles et al [6] who noted a fall in capillary blood flow but sustained flow in arteriovenous anastomoses. This was interpreted as a thermoregulatory response to dissipate heat in the arteriovenous anastomoses, overriding the effect of high circulating adrenaline.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%