2014
DOI: 10.3368/aa.51.1.41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional Variation in Thule and Colonial Caribou Hunting in West Greenland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combining marine geophysical, sedimentological, and archeological data and considerations, we suggest that the Blinkerwall is of late-Pleistocene/earliest Holocene age. The wide absence of similar-sized Stone Age megastructures in Europe is likely due to preservation issues on the densely populated subcontinent, while difficulties of identification or even recognition could play another role ( 69 , 70 ). Offshore, their recognition is mainly hindered by the required centimeter to decimeter scale resolution of hydroacoustic data, which was usually not achieved in legacy studies conducted over the last decades.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining marine geophysical, sedimentological, and archeological data and considerations, we suggest that the Blinkerwall is of late-Pleistocene/earliest Holocene age. The wide absence of similar-sized Stone Age megastructures in Europe is likely due to preservation issues on the densely populated subcontinent, while difficulties of identification or even recognition could play another role ( 69 , 70 ). Offshore, their recognition is mainly hindered by the required centimeter to decimeter scale resolution of hydroacoustic data, which was usually not achieved in legacy studies conducted over the last decades.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the high spatial resolution of UAV imagery, it was sometimes difficult to identify caribou fence sections (i.e., a human construct) as its overlapping or parallel orientated CWD objects have to be differentiated from naturally present CWD objects left untouched. These challenges are not unlike identifying animal drive systems or kill sites on the ground or through remote sensing approaches in other environmental settings (e.g., Brink 2005;O'Shea et al 2014;Pasda 2014;Hamilton 2018). Future work related to the (semi)-automated detection of CWD objects for archaeological mapping purposes therefore ought to consider the likelihood of belonging to an anthropogenic feature compared to being a naturally placed object.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%