2022
DOI: 10.3390/medicina58070933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional Variety of Reduction in Retinal Thickness of Diabetic Macular Edema after Anti-VEGF Treatment

Abstract: Background and Objectives: The presence of refractory cases resistant to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy for diabetic macular edema (DME) is a problem in clinical practice. This study aimed to explore the less responsive area of optical coherence tomography (OCT) 3D map the characteristics of naïve DME cases after their first anti-VEGF. Materials and Methods: In 46 patients with DME who received an intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents, retinal thickness in 100 sections of the macul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 2 , 3 , 17 , 18 ] Allingham et al reported finding an improvement rate for FA leakage after anti-VEGF treatment was 45.5% for diffuse edema and 17.9% for focal edema, which indicates that anti-VEGF treatment was less effective for focal edema that involves MAs. [ 3 ] Yamada et al reported that higher capillary mass density weakens the effect of anti-VEGF on retinal edema, based on the relationship between capillary mass density measured from fluorescence fundus angiography and local retinal thickness by OCT. [ 12 , 13 ] Their method evaluates the state of local retinal thickness better than our study. Although our study uses sector retinal thickness, we were able to confirm with a simple method that the number of MAs is associated with the efficacy of anti-VEGF therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[ 2 , 3 , 17 , 18 ] Allingham et al reported finding an improvement rate for FA leakage after anti-VEGF treatment was 45.5% for diffuse edema and 17.9% for focal edema, which indicates that anti-VEGF treatment was less effective for focal edema that involves MAs. [ 3 ] Yamada et al reported that higher capillary mass density weakens the effect of anti-VEGF on retinal edema, based on the relationship between capillary mass density measured from fluorescence fundus angiography and local retinal thickness by OCT. [ 12 , 13 ] Their method evaluates the state of local retinal thickness better than our study. Although our study uses sector retinal thickness, we were able to confirm with a simple method that the number of MAs is associated with the efficacy of anti-VEGF therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Several studies have reported that the efficacy of anti-VEGF treatments varies depending on the pathogenesis of the retinal edema. [3,[11][12][13] Focal edema is defined as edema around the MA caused by a leaking MA. [2,3,17,18] Allingham et al reported finding an improvement rate for FA leakage after anti-VEGF treatment was 45.5% for diffuse edema and 17.9% for focal edema, which indicates that anti-VEGF treatment was less effective for focal edema that involves MAs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In DME treatment, anti-VEGF therapy is effective for reducing the retinal thickness and decreasing the size of edematous areas; however, residual focal edema frequently remains, as seen in 65.8% of cases after the first injection [ 48 ]. An analysis using a 3D mode OCT map wherein an edematous area was divided into 100 sections showed that the reduction in retinal thickness after anti-VEGF therapy varied in regions of the DME [ 49 ]. A 10–20% reduction in retinal thickness accounted for approximately 40% of the total edematous areas, whereas only 6.4% of the edematous areas showed a reduction in retinal thickness of 30% or more.…”
Section: Clinical Role Of Mas In the Management Of Dr And Dmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results suggest that the edema-improving effect of anti-VEGF therapy varies by site and that some sites are less responsive than others. Notably, the MA density was higher in refractory areas, which was also where the reduction in retinal thickness after anti-VEGF therapy was minimal [ 49 ]. Additionally, the areas with residual edema after anti-VEGF treatment had a higher density of MAs than areas with improvement in edema [ 48 ].…”
Section: Clinical Role Of Mas In the Management Of Dr And Dmementioning
confidence: 99%