2008
DOI: 10.4267/climatologie.647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Régionalisation des précipitations sur les massifs montagneux français à l’aide de régressions locales et par types de temps

Abstract: Les phénomènes météorologiques en montagne sont influencés par de nombreux facteurs tels que le relief ou l'altitude, et possèdent de ce fait une grande variabilité spatiale, qui rend l'hydrométéorologie des bassins versants de montagne particulièrement complexe. Au regard de cette hétérogénéité spatiale, les postes d'observations sont à ces altitudes trop peu nombreux. Les mesures sont de plus réalisées dans des conditions parfois difficiles (neige, vent) et sont donc souvent entachées d'importantes incertitu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we used the same multiplication factor for winter and summer precipitation, ignoring the phase of the precipitation. The correction factor could be different and closer to that for liquid precipitation (Gottardi, 2009). Nonetheless, the rain heat flux is known to be of minor importance for the total SEB on glaciers in the Alps (Hock, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, we used the same multiplication factor for winter and summer precipitation, ignoring the phase of the precipitation. The correction factor could be different and closer to that for liquid precipitation (Gottardi, 2009). Nonetheless, the rain heat flux is known to be of minor importance for the total SEB on glaciers in the Alps (Hock, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The mean multiplication factor is found to be 1.64 over the whole glacier. For comparison, Gerbaux and others (2005) found a factor of 1.5 for the whole glacier and Gottardi (2009) found a value of 1.6 for solid precipitation in this massif. The precipitation correction factor takes into account the difference of scale (glacier vs massif) and the high-altitude effects on the precipitation field estimates.…”
Section: Study Site and Datamentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The Euclidean distance is applied using a weight Ω for elevation: Δx12+Δx22+(Ω.Δx3)2. For instance, a weight Ω = 20 is used for precipitation in Gottardi et al [, ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On average, the multiplication factors used for the SAFRAN precipitation adjustment are 1.3 for Arveyron d'Argentière and 1.4 for Arveyron de la Mer de Glace. For comparison, these values are slightly lower than those quantified by Gerbaux and others (2005) (1.5) for the Argentière and Saint-Sorlin glaciers, Gottardi (2009) (1.6) for solid precipitation on the French Alps and Dumont and others (2012) (1.64) for the Saint-Sorlin glacier. It should be noted that the values for this factor depend on the calibration period and the site considered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 50%