2006
DOI: 10.1021/ja063987z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regioselective Arene Hydroxylation Mediated by a (μ-Peroxo)diiron(III) Complex:  A Functional Model for Toluene Monooxygenase

Abstract: The diiron center of toluene monooxygenase hydroxylase (TMOH) is capable of oxidizing arenes, alkenes, and haloalkanes. 1 Recently, the diiron center of toluene/o-xylene monooxygenase hydroxylase (ToMOH) has been shown to have a carboxylate-rich environment similar to that of soluble methane monooxygenase (MMOH). 1a,2 Extensive studies of MMOH have provided a fundamental basis for the understanding of the structural and spectroscopic properties and the reaction mechanisms. In the catalytic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar Mössbauer parameters have been assigned to a synthetic, structurally characterized model (μ-1,2-peroxo)diiron(III) model complex supported by a tris(pyrazolyl)borate ligand scaffold (57) as well as the peroxodiiron(III) intermediate generated in the W48A/D84E variant of RNR-R2 that are assigned μ-peroxide binding geometries (12, 58). The absorbance of P ∗ around 720 nm (ε = 1250 M −1 cm −1 ) is similar to those of well-characterized peroxodiiron(III) species in enzymes (10, 15, 42, 59, 60) and model systems (57, 61) assigned as peroxo-to-Fe(III) charge transfer transitions. Because of its spectroscopic similarities to those of known enzyme intermediates and model complexes, P ∗ is likely to contain a peroxodiiron(III) unit.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Similar Mössbauer parameters have been assigned to a synthetic, structurally characterized model (μ-1,2-peroxo)diiron(III) model complex supported by a tris(pyrazolyl)borate ligand scaffold (57) as well as the peroxodiiron(III) intermediate generated in the W48A/D84E variant of RNR-R2 that are assigned μ-peroxide binding geometries (12, 58). The absorbance of P ∗ around 720 nm (ε = 1250 M −1 cm −1 ) is similar to those of well-characterized peroxodiiron(III) species in enzymes (10, 15, 42, 59, 60) and model systems (57, 61) assigned as peroxo-to-Fe(III) charge transfer transitions. Because of its spectroscopic similarities to those of known enzyme intermediates and model complexes, P ∗ is likely to contain a peroxodiiron(III) unit.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In light of this fact, rR spectra of 2 •O 2 AsMe 2 , 2 •O 2 PPh 2 and 3 •O 2 PPh 2 were collected, analyzed and compared with spectra presented in earlier reports21,26,40,4246 in an attempt to gain insight into their individual molecular structures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complexes 1 and 2 exhibit similar reactivity patterns, but 1 generates a more powerful oxidant than 2. Recently, efficient and selective intramolecular aromatic hydroxylations were reported with mononuclear [28,29] or dinuclear [30][31][32][33][34] iron complexes in which the aromatic ring is forced into close proximity of the iron center by a covalent linkage to the supporting polydentate ligand. The need to independently prepare the compounds containing both reactive iron center and the aromatic substrate, however, limits the applicability of these systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%