2023
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.3c00538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regiospecific Cellulose Orientation and Anisotropic Mechanical Property in Plant Cell Walls

Jongcheol Lee,
Juseok Choi,
Luyi Feng
et al.

Abstract: Cellulose microfibrils (CMFs) are a major loadbearing component in plant cell walls. Thus, their structures have been studied extensively with spectroscopic and microscopic characterization methods, but the findings from these two approaches were inconsistent, which hampers the mechanistic understanding of cell wall mechanics. Here, we report the regiospecific assembly of CMFs in the periclinal wall of plant epidermal cells. Using sum frequency generation spectroscopic imaging, we found that CMFs are highly al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 60 publications
(186 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The beam size (200 µm wide × 50 µm tall) was large enough to cover about two cells in the unstretched state. This could be from the bimodal alignment of cellulose crystals in the thin anticlinal (side) walls [ 23,24 ] or a small percentage of microfibrils in the periclinal (flat) walls. [ 25 ] Overall, the X‐ray intensities as a function of polar angle in unstretched walls are consistent with a cell wall structure that is dominated by multiple lamellae with random cellulose microfibril orientation, [ 5,10 ] although the modest enhancement of scattering intensities separated by 90° could indicate a subtle preference for a bimodal cellulose orientation, or a small region of the sample that exhibits a predominant bimodal orientation, similarly to a previous report.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The beam size (200 µm wide × 50 µm tall) was large enough to cover about two cells in the unstretched state. This could be from the bimodal alignment of cellulose crystals in the thin anticlinal (side) walls [ 23,24 ] or a small percentage of microfibrils in the periclinal (flat) walls. [ 25 ] Overall, the X‐ray intensities as a function of polar angle in unstretched walls are consistent with a cell wall structure that is dominated by multiple lamellae with random cellulose microfibril orientation, [ 5,10 ] although the modest enhancement of scattering intensities separated by 90° could indicate a subtle preference for a bimodal cellulose orientation, or a small region of the sample that exhibits a predominant bimodal orientation, similarly to a previous report.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%